Shahzadas Custody & US Court

The one and only free public forum for Bohras. The focus of this forum is the reform movement, the Dawoodi Bohra faith and, of course, the corrupt priesthood. But the discussion is in no way restricted to the Bohras alone.
jamanpasand
Posts: 468
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 4:01 am

Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#1

Unread post by jamanpasand » Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:07 pm

Which US Court the custody battle is fought. Maula ask mumineen not to go to court. Why they have gone to the court? Would their Mojazas can not do some wonders for them?

haqniwaat
Posts: 516
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#2

Unread post by haqniwaat » Wed Dec 24, 2014 8:28 pm

Ask your moula which one of his servants has posted this disgusting blog - https://dearmrqutbuddin.wordpress.com/a ... qutbuddin/. You want to have a court battle?! Wait till you get sued in a US Court of Law for posting such filth and infringing copyright.

accountability
Posts: 1640
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 4:01 am

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#3

Unread post by accountability » Wed Dec 24, 2014 9:14 pm

I read the blog, which is interesting. different name bloggers have blogged choreographed messages. looks like written by jamia students. shukran jazilla etc. most of the material are from linkedhin, facebook, websites. reproduction without consent from facebook or linkdhin or website is an infringement of privacy and can be sued for damages and also criminally prosecuted. here is a lawyer's opinion on copyright
Lowdown on Copyright

Intellectual property law is an interesting area. For example, did you know that copyright is granted the moment a piece of work is written, recorded or created? Copyright, unlike trademarks or patents, does not typically need to be formally applied for and is a general right provided by U.S. law to authors of "original works of authorship." More facts on copyright are available from StopFakes.gov and Copyright.gov.

Does that mean you can reuse or copy the work of others without consequences? Well, no.

Once someone has posted their work on the Internet – whether it’s on their website, YouTube, Flickr, or even original social media content – you generally need to request permission if you want to reproduce it. Why? Copyright law expressly prohibits you from reusing that content without permission from the author. It’s not enough to simply attribute or credit the work to an author, photographer, or videographer. Without permission, you are vulnerable to infringement lawsuits, especially if you are using the copyrighted content to drive traffic to your website or for other commercial purposes.

so reproducing facebook postings, and reproducing dr moiz website is serious breach.

Universaldad
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 2:50 am

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#4

Unread post by Universaldad » Thu Dec 25, 2014 2:34 am

haqniwaat wrote:Ask your moula which one of his servants has posted this disgusting blog - https://dearmrqutbuddin.wordpress.com/a ... qutbuddin/. You want to have a court battle?! Wait till you get sued in a US Court of Law for posting such filth and infringing copyright.
Haq ne waat, KQ ke waat laga rahe hai sab log. KQ is just like David Koresh, the comparison between KQ toli and the davidian cult is very well established. Make sure you are in Dar us Sakifa when KQ burns down the house.

:D

Abuzer
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:47 am

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#5

Unread post by Abuzer » Thu Dec 25, 2014 3:31 am

I feel so sad after reading all this, such a nice and respected community is now getting into pieces just because few people want more money on expense of people dignity.

and I think past and present leaders are responsible for this. no matter if people don't accept it, but it is obvious there was a fault and mistake from the leading 3 seat of dawat they miserably failed to deliver their duties on time and yet they are not sorry for this.

keeping people ignorant from Quran and sunnah and always talking about self glorification lead to this disaster.

natkhat pari
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat May 03, 2014 8:56 am

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#6

Unread post by natkhat pari » Thu Dec 25, 2014 4:39 am

sir
what was verdict in domestic violence case in usa.
kindly update us at earliest

humanbeing
Posts: 2195
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:30 am

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#7

Unread post by humanbeing » Sat Dec 27, 2014 4:50 am

By dragging the children custody case in public and asking people to recite various duaas and offer prayers is a tactic to involve the commoners into their private tussle and make a party to win or loose feeling. whatever is the outcome of the case, sms camp will have sympathizers or celebrators accordingly. a smart way to wash their dirty laundry in public or have their dirty laundry washed by people.

Also this private problem promoted publicly helps in gaining sympathy and provide distraction from nuss controversy.

accountability
Posts: 1640
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 4:01 am

Re: Shahzadas Custody & US Court

#8

Unread post by accountability » Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:19 am

it is pathetic on their part to wash their dirty laundry in public. they are ridiculing the son of syedna tahir saifuddin. and mazoon for 50 years. I had said two or so years ago, when this nuss was being played out. that this will result in bitter family fueds, they are inter married, and children will have to bear the burnt of their elders. what has become of them, no decency left. come on grow up and get some manners, there are no miracles, there will be no miracles.
what if court decides to give custody to father, will children live without mother, as now they are living without father. what kind of mother and fathers are them. I can give my life for my children. most of us will. but these are not common peoples. they have steel hearts. love your children, parents are for sacrifices, give children their due. leave your elders knighthood fights to themselves. you may opt to live separate but with your children, don't have to do anything with either.