Supreme Court strikes down Section 66A of IT Act which allowed arrests for objectionable content online
here4truth wrote:According to the legal constitution of India.. This forum (website) should be banned/removed/revoked as it insults the current Prime Minister of India who is the supreme most position of the country.
No matter who is in the position at the moment but the position itself is esteem and is protected under Indian Law.
Law makers?? sleeping?
The Supreme Court on Tuesday declared Section 66A of Information Technology Act as unconstitutional and struck it down.
This section had been widely misused by police in various states to arrest innocent persons for posting critical comments about social and political issues and political leaders on social networking sites.
The court said such a law hit at the root of liberty and freedom of expression, two cardinal pillars of democracy.
The court said such a law hit at the root of liberty and freedom of expression, the two cardinal pillars of democracy. The court said the section has to be erased from the law books as it has gone much beyond the reasonable restrictions put by the Constitution on freedom of speech. The Supreme Court said section 66A was vaguely worded and allowed its misuse by police.
The court, however, upheld the validity of section 69B and the 2011 guidelines for the implementation of the I-T Act that allowed the government to block websites if their content had the potential to create communal disturbance, social disorder or affect India's relationship with other countries.
However, the court watered down section 79 of the I-T Act making it further difficult for the police to harass innocent for their comments on social network sites.
The SC delivered its judgment on a bunch of petitions filed in the light of misuse of the penal provision by government authorities against persons who allegedly uploaded offensive posts on social networking sites.
Former attorney general Soli J Sorabjee, who appeared for one of the petitioners, termed the judgment a 'glorious vindication' of right to free speech. He spoke to the TOI after SC bench of Justices J Chelameswar and R F Nariman struck down section 66A as unconstitutional. Sorabjee said: "The judgment is well researched, well reasoned and erudite in expression. It is a glorious vindication of freedom of expression."
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 672244.cms