FROM THE QUTBI BOHRA BLOG:
http://qutbibohras.blogspot.com/2016/06 ... ah-ra.html
Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA & Sulaiman’s claim
Taher delivered a speech on the 19th of Ramadan 1437H. During this speech, prior to his talk on the Debate & The Case he spoke about Syedna Dawood bin QutubshahRA and and gave a completely distorted version of Fatemi history.
The Qutbi Bohra site including Husain Qutbuddin have brought up this claim in the past, but since it hasn't been discussed earlier, this article aims to focus on this subject.
In brief, this is what Taher mentioned in his 19th Ramadan 1437H speech:
People ask why KQ went to court first, Taher says this is similar to how Syedna Dawood bin Qutub Shah RA went to the court of Akbar.
Taher goes on to say, Syedna Dawood bin Qutub Shah RA established his haq … the proof to establishing his haq - "ehni waat ni daleel ye che", the biggest proof - "mohta ma mohti daleel ye che" was that he was the Mazoon of Syedna Dawood bin Ajabshah RA."Aap mazoon hatha..sachai ni zabaan ye che…ye missal bawaji sahib (KQ) amal karey che..sachai ni zabaan che.. haq ni waat karey che.. ke burhanuddin moula nass mara upar kidi che".
The distortion and misconception in the Qutbi version couldn't be more evident.
Fatemi texts including Syedna Taher Saifuddin's RA Risalah offer the arguments establishing the Nass of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA. From these arguments, it is evident that he was proven to be the haq na Dai, NOT because he was the Mazoon, BUT only because he was the recipient of Nass & Tawqeef. Similarly, Sulaiman’s falsehood was exposed on multiple occasions.
I present a brief history of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah’s RA history in connection to the claim of Sulaiman. I have underlined the obvious connections between the Khuzaima Qutbuddin and Sulaiman:
When the 24th Dai Syedna Yusuf Najmuddin RA passed away, Syedna Jalal Shamsuddin RA initially performed nass on Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA. [1] [2] Later on, Syedna Jalal Shamsuddin RA performed nass on Syedna Dawood bin Ajabshah RA.[3]
After Syedna Dawood bin Ajabshah RA passed away and Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA assumed the office of the Dai Mutlaq, Sulaiman did iqraar of the Nass on Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA for 3 years. He wrote numerous letters to Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA affirming the maqaam of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA. Snippets of these letters have been cited by Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA in his Risalah Shareefah.[5] There also exists a manuscript of the book Taweel al-Daim in Sulaiman’s writing in which he does iqraar of the maqaam of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA. This manuscript is preserved in the library of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS.[6]
After 3 years, Sulaiman was influenced by some detractors, compiled a forged nasss document and did da’wo that he was the claimant.
Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA compiled two Risalas in refutation of Sulaiman’s claims.[7]
Sulaiman (NOT Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA) went on to file a case in the Royal Court of Akbar baadshah, there he revealed the asraar from Dawat books.[8]
Sulaiman was asked what the basis of his claim was – in reply he he said he was the rightful Dai. His claim was without any witnesses.[9] On the other hand, the hudood established the rightful nass on Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA by providing evidence of the Nass on Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA, witnesses to the Nass on Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA, and numerous evidence that Sulaiman’s accepted the maqaam of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA for of 3 years.[10]
Sulaiman’s followers also claimed certain monies owed to them, but their claim was also dismissed because they had no witnesses nor evidence.[11]
After Sulaiman was proven wrong, he then conspired to spread false rumours about Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA to Akbar. Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA then travelled to Lahore/Kashmir to the darbaar of Akbar baadshah. [12]
When Sulaiman heard the news of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah’s RA arrival, he panicked and his health deteriorated and his continuous lies led him to suffer a speech impairment. He died soon after in 1005H.
Sulaiman’s followers transported his body to Ahmedabad. This was completely against the tenets of shariat, which states that bodies should be buried in their place of death, and not transported to distant lands. [13]
Even after Sulaiman’s death, arguments between the two parties continued, and the falsehood of Sulaiman’s faction was exposed. [14]
Numerous hudood have refuted the claims of Sulaiman based on the premise that he had no witnesses, some are as follows:
o Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA states that Sulaiman's followers accepted a nass without any witnesses. Addressing the Sulaimaniyeen (followers of Sulaiman), the author goes on to say “you lie when you say that the Dai (Syedna Dawood bin Ajabshah RA) passed away suddenly without doing any wasiyyat... even though his illness was known and he had made preparations for his own demise… we are Dawoodi Bohras because we refuted Sulaiman's claim of nass without witnesses. He then goes on to say "Whoever comes forth with Nass & Tawqeef, is the rightful Dai."[15]
o Syedi Hasan bin Idris QR wrote a refutation qasidah to to to Sulaiman, some of the verses are provided below[16]:
و ذا مقام عظيم لا يتم لمن * لم يأت بالنص توقيفا و توجيها
فهات لي مشبها ما قلت من حجج * هاتي لنا شاهدا ان كنت قاضيها
وكل دعوى اذا لم تأت بينة * كانت لعمري اباطيلا و تمويها
[Translation: …this (The rutba of Dawat) is a "maqaam e azeem" that cannot be claimed by the one who does not bring forth Nass & Tawqeef ... Rasulullah appointed Moulana Ali through Nass & Tawqeef ... so… bring me some proof ... bring us even one witness to your claim ... every claim (dawo) that doesn't have proof is baatil (false) and fabricated][17]
***
The similarities in the story of Khuzaima Qutbuddin are evident.
Khuzaima & his children did iqraar of the Nass on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS for 3 years in their sermons [18] [19] [20], on their website[21], he gave mubarakbaadi[22] and presided over the Nass majlis[23]. He even sat in the tarteeb below[24] Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS.
KQ sitting in tarteeb below Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS in the hazrat of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA.
After the demise of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA, it was KQ that went to court first. Two years later, he died in USA, and his body was transported 8,500 miles away to Thane for burial[25].
***
It is also important to note that despite numerous articles by the Qutbi Bohra there is no direct reference in Dawat texts that Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA was the Mazoon. Their articles simply mention or assume that he was the Mazoon, without citing any references.
***
Concluding, the haqqaniyyat of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA was proven, NOT because he was the Mazoon (as Taher Fakhruddin claims), instead it was established through witnesses, Nass & Tawqeef. This isn’t the first time the Qutbi Bohras have twisted unambiguous historical facts. They prey on the ignorance of their followers who believe whatever is fed to them without verifying the true facts. All references have been clearly provided in this article.
Taher then referred to KQ's call to debate. He says that his "enemies" did not answer this challenge out of fear - in his words "ghabrai gaya aney waato karwa laga".
KQ, Husain and now Taher continue to call us out to debate when every single of their false claims have been refuted on this Blog and other sites. These points have been summarized in the Summary of The Fitnat page, under the heading "Khuzaima’s & Taher's Falsehood Exposed".
I call upon and challenge the entire Qutbi team to answer this simple challenge if indeed they have nerves to:
Counter just one point mentioned on the Summary of The Fitnat page.
Or, to start off, answer a simple question regarding to their reference from Kitaab Taaj al Aqaid (Taaj al Aqaid – Izn, Itlaq & The Truth | Taher's Arabic Speech | Taaj al Aqaid – Izn, Itlaq & The Truth: An Interpretation?)
Till date, the Qutbi Bohras haven't been able to refute even one of these points.
Indeed, it is them who "ghabrai gaya aney waato karwa laga"
To KQ and the Qutbi Leaders I challenge:
قل هاتوا برهانكم ان كنتم صادقين
[Bring forth your burhan (proof), if indeed you are truthful]
[1] Pg 395, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[2] On their site, The Qutbi Bohras has purposely avoided this salient point when documenting the history of Syedna Dawood bin Qutubshah RA. They avoid it because it refutes their ‘Nass cannot be changed’ theory.
[3] Pg 395, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[4] Pg 384, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[5]Pg 412 - 423, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[6] Pg 170, Risalah Shareefah, Kamaal al-Ne’am al-Saabighah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[7] Pg 434, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[8] Pg 434, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[9] Pg 437, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[10] Pg 438, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[11] Pg 439, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[12] Pg 440, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[13] Pg 447, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[14] Pg 449, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[15] Risalah Shareefah, Zaw o Noor al-Haq al Mubeen, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[16] Pg 456, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[17] Pg 456, Risalah Shareefah, Ne’am al-Sibghah al-Ilahiyyah, Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA
[18] Khuzaima has Accepted that S.M.B. R.A did the Nass on Syedna Mufaddal saifuddin (TUS)
[19] Abdeali, Khuzema's son on Nass proclamation - YouTube
[20] Khuzaima has Accepted that S.M.B. R.A did the Nass on Syedna Mufaddal saifuddin (TUS)
[21]
https://believesyednaqutbuddin.files.wo ... t_then.jpg
[22] Talk of rift
[23] 'Attended majlis where successor was announced' - Mumbai - News _ News Syndication _ Content Syndication
[24]
https://believesyednaqutbuddin.files.wo ... zoon-2.jpg
[25] QUTBUDDIN, WHO DIED IN US, WILL BE BURIED IN MUMBAI