ajamali wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:34 am
HJK wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:55 am
Bhai dcp you saw me ask a couple of questions to some FD brothers. Answering them was far they started name calling rather running from one thread to another.
The simple conclusion to the court case is, if they cannot answer simple questions to a mumin, winning in courts is far from the truth.
I saw your questions being answered several times. You just did not like the answers you got. There is a big difference. You are a faker. You came on this forum under false pretense. You are the ilk of Fake53, contorting facts and texts to suit your narrative. Coming here pretending you were inclined towards FD. You have still not answered the questions that FD people have asked time and again. Why it was so important to you to insist that no sajda was done when they have clearly admitted in court that they did sajda? What does a sajda signify to you? Why would Burhanuddin Moula allow his presumable “hamshaan” to do sajda to someone else? Would he really do nass on someone who was not his hamshaan? Why would he hide his “nass” from his mansoos for 40 long years and go around telling Others about it but not his mansoos himself?!! Did he trust others more than his mansoos? Does the 1388 nass pass the smell test for you? It’s a joke to anyone who has spent even 5 minutes thinking about it.
The name calling was more intense on your end. I did not see anyone from FD use words like bobra or gobra although they could easily have called Muffy the dhobra father of a b-b-b-bobra son. Just giving you a taste of the shit you spew.
Answers where if you could re quote them please!!
Me inclined or not is not important, what is rather important is if you can atleast answer the most common questions. You claim to have answered all but i can see none.
Where is the sajda in the video? When has anybody accepted that there was sajda. It has not been accepted even in the courts. Kindly get the proof for what you say. What you guys have been providing yet is
Nass in skq - no proof
Nass on stf - no proof
Sajda for skq - no proof
Skq was attacked twice - no police complaints not even araz to Burhanuddin Maula / no proof
Nass can be done in private - translations of poonawala / no proof.
And the list goes on and on.
Burhanuddin Maula r a never allowed the sajda. Where is the proof again.
Why would he hide his nass from the mansoos, syedna taher saifuddin was informed later, also did you ask stf why he was informed later & not directly.
About 1388 you can wait and watch for the forensic in the court. Let the courts do the work, you dont get into smelling and be a sniffer.
You know what a joke is or rather suspicious is
The mistake in the nass letter to stf
Only 2 women witnesses
Skqs sudden death
His wishes in ththe burial
So on and so forth.
You would probably have to go through the previous posts and see when have i ever called names. Also about MS s son, when he recites Quran, he wins everyone and everything.
