There's no comparison.objectiveobserver53 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 2:16 pmAfter calling us YouTube dawat, they are resorting to it themselves! Did someone not say imitation is the highest form of flattery?
The Majlises are being streamed *privately*, using login credentials. This is how relays of waaz have been done since Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin s time. This is nothing new.
Keyword: Private, not Public.
Whereas TB and the Qutbi Bohras continue to operate a YouTube Dawat, on a platform which is publicly accessible.
Keyword: Public, not private.
Proggies and others sects on this platform are free to debate whether it should be private or public.
However, anyone with an iota of understanding of *true* "Fatemi" philosophy will know that esteemed Duat of the past, including Syedna Moiyed Al Shirazi and Syedna Qadi Noman have stressed that "Majalis Al Hikmah" should remain private, to a select audience and not public. This is why they were held within the Imams Palace.
Again, keywords: Private, not Public.
If anyone is imitating, then it Taher Fakhruddin that's imitating dissenters in the history of Fatemi history (eg: Ja'far) that chose to make public what was deemed to be private. They went against these Fatemi principles.
Taher Fakhruddin and his Qutbi Bohras are following their footsteps. حذو النعل بالنعل