Answerer, use a little common sense when you try to make analogies. You are trying to compare Rasulallah's keeping of the 3 close to him with Burhanuddin mola's keeping SKQ as mazoon for 50 years. Let's rationalize these two situations:answerer wrote:think_for_yourself wrote: Salaar bhai as an adna mumin I see myself more than qualified to sense the spirituality of one person over another. I do trust my own heart and mind more than what someone tells me. That is why I doubted the alleged nass when I saw the video and never heard Burhanuddin Aqa say in his own voice that he had conferred nass. And please do not point to the newly uploaded video with it's doctored audio. I have seen the original video enough number of times to know what I heard and saw.
MS's tentative and unsure behavior in Raudat Tahera and his first sentence claiming that he was not deserving, increased my doubts further! I never ever heard SMB doubt his own capabilities or his worthiness as a dai. In fact he always said loud and clear that HE would lead us to watan e qadeem. My doubts were confirmed when I heard MS's nonsensical bayaans. I want my two and a half years and 50 hours spent in hearing nonsensical bayaans back! There were some simple reasons why I was won over by SKQ. No one had to enact a drama to make me believe that he was the 53rd dai. He told the truth in a way that made me believe him. His rutba is one of three that has defined dawat for me for my whole life. If SMB trusted him to keep him as mazoon for fifty years, I had no reason not to trust him.
If your heart tells you that MS is the next dai and your brain is convinced then I guess you must follow your heart and mind. Mine begs to differ. But it sounds like you are not really entirely convinced because you cannot think of 10 qualities that makes him fit to lead his people. And you are jumping to criticize his administration which is really SMB's administration that was run by proxy by his sons for the last few years....
well bhai ...
For many people the question might arise that how could Khuzaima Qutbuddin have remained in his position for so long and never been removed. In fact, this is one of the claims that he and his children have
purported on their website, Fatimidawat.com,“On 17th Shaban 1434H Syedna Qutbuddin became the only Mazoon in the history of Dawat to serve a single Dai for fifty years. Despite many attempts by those exploiting Syedna’s trust over the years – especially Shehzada Mufaddal bhaisaheb – Syedna Burhanuddin maintained without fail, in every misaq and every majlis, that Syedna Qutbuddin was his Mazoon.”This might seem compelling if one did not keep the history of Da’wat in mind. Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA always read the zikr of Rasullullah’s SAW zaman in his Mawa’iz Nuraniyya (bayaano). Even at that time there were certain figures whom we all know seemed very close to Rasullullah SAW. Rasullullah SAW did not explicitly remove them from Da’wat, rather he kept them close and in their positions. This might be a very difficult concept to understand,however, it is by no means an isolated event in Da’wat’s history. Awliyaullah AS have followed this policy, one that is focused on the prosperity and of Da’wat and the preservation of the nufus of mumineen.For instance, Aqa Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddas RA has done bayan in his Risala Sharifa,Rawḍ Dār al-Salām,about the 41st Dai Syedna Abduttayyib Zakiuddin RA and his organization of the tartib of the hudood when he ascended to ‘Arsh ud Da’wat (pgs. 257-258). In this event,Syedna Zakiuddin RA kept some of the hudood in their positions despite their insufficiencies, either completely or partly, in knowledge (‘ilm), deeds (‘amal),and walayat, because the time at hand required the political step to do so. This was done for a reason and matter keepingin mind the the ultimate welfareof the Da’wat and the conformity and harmony of the community at large.Therefore, it shouldn’t be that surprising that this policy, one with spiritual benefits in mind, also took place in this zaman. Aqa Moula Syenda Muhammed Burhanuddin RA always kept the well-being of mumineen in mind and emphasized the forces that united us rather than pay attention to the lurking darkness that might divide us. Therefore, this might explain why Khuzaima waited until Moula al-Hayy al-Muqaddass RA closed his eyes for eternal rest to deploy what he has been scheming for fifty years.
Rasulallah kept the 3 close to him as they were powerful, affluent and influential people, he needed them in the early days for the spread of Islam. Whereas SMB RA had no political reason to make SKQ mazoon, he was a young around 25 year old bhaisab and way down in tarteeb. There were many more powerful people SMB RA could have chosen if siyasat was his objective. But he chose SKQ because he was created and moulded by STS RA and destined to be Dai some day. So as you see the two situations are not analogus. Similarly Syedna Abdul Tayyeb Zakiyuddin had to keep some of his hudood in place because they were powerful people and siyasat was necessary. Whereas SMB's appointment of SKQ was a show of conviction of faith and it ruffled many powerful people like YN and his bros. This was no act of siyasat!
cant beat that 
