Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

The one and only free public forum for Bohras. The focus of this forum is the reform movement, the Dawoodi Bohra faith and, of course, the corrupt priesthood. But the discussion is in no way restricted to the Bohras alone.
level_headed
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:02 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2281

Unread post by level_headed » Sun Mar 18, 2018 12:34 am

Moiz bhai get some answers. The best you hve been doing is explaining the abbreviations of DMBS
Please use your intellect as shz husain suggests in his videos and answer those. Shall be beneficial to all.
Nice answers HJK and Vas_anwala . Ask any kid - Daawedar Kaun hai to wo batayega LKQ
Ask Google -type in dawedar and see what comes up

dal-chaval-palidu
Posts: 534
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2282

Unread post by dal-chaval-palidu » Sun Mar 18, 2018 11:00 pm

bhai HJK, level-headed, Momineem bhai, ..

Answer this sincere question: How is it okay or acceptable to lie?

http://www.freepressjournal.in/ujjain/u ... as/1234324

http://www.freepressjournal.in/ujjain/u ... es/1235077

http://www.thedawoodibohras.com/na_ui.a ... cle_id=110

SMS was fine and hale and hearty, and that is good. Why tell AMU that he will not be able to attend due to health reasons? He could simply have said he cannot attend due to other prior commitments and this would have been a non-issue.

The question becomes: Why should people believe other things (like claim of nass) when they can lie in such matters?

HJK
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:20 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2283

Unread post by HJK » Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:07 am

Going for the ziyarat of Duat is one thing i definitely do if i wasnt well, to pray. It would be rather not good on cancelling the ziyarat rather.
Can you judge a persons health just by thier face?

Meeting the religious children would definitely boost the health a bit and make feel good, just like we do when we are not well.


On the other hand meeting the Respected president and holding a convocation is a completely different thing.

dal-chaval-palidu
Posts: 534
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2284

Unread post by dal-chaval-palidu » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:56 am

HJK wrote:
Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:07 am
Going for the ziyarat of Duat is one thing i definitely do if i wasnt well, to pray. It would be rather not good on cancelling the ziyarat rather.
Can you judge a persons health just by thier face?

Meeting the religious children would definitely boost the health a bit and make feel good, just like we do when we are not well.


On the other hand meeting the Respected president and holding a convocation is a completely different thing.
He (SMS) just did not go only for ziyarat. He went to people's houses for ziyafat, did a waiz, and went in an open-air jeep, did Nikah and misaq of children (and you know, typically, the only kids in that group for misaq are those who can give a fat cover, not ordinary or poor or religious bohras). I do not know any details of his health, nor can I judge from the face, and I wish him a long life; but the actions do not appear to be the actions of a person who is unwell.

And when he is unwell, he would typically go to SMB or STS ziyarat, as they mention STS and SMB all the time in case there is any mushkil.

And he does NOT have to hold a convocation, please ... It probably went fine without his presence too.

Also, you are unlikely to have a pre-planned program for 6 days (as mentioned in the newspaper) if you have just come for ziyarat for health reasons.

More than that, Allah knows best.

bohraspy
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:17 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2285

Unread post by bohraspy » Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:51 am

Does anyone know what happened with STF in court today? I'm heering some lies about it. I wanted to authentify.,

level_headed
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:02 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2286

Unread post by level_headed » Wed Mar 21, 2018 5:54 pm

bohraspy wrote:
Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:51 am
Does anyone know what happened with STF in court today? I'm heering some lies about it. I wanted to authentify.,
[DELETED FOR FOUL LANGUAGE]

level_headed
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:02 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2287

Unread post by level_headed » Wed Mar 21, 2018 9:00 pm

Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin and Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin have been called worse names and I have never ever seen the alacrity shown by the admin to delete messages for foul language

level_headed
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:02 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2288

Unread post by level_headed » Wed Mar 21, 2018 9:07 pm

TB officially has become a lisper / stammerer. His new name is Little Lisper. Judge gave him a hard time and his speaking stopped.
Big Lisper did nass on Little Lisper - to someone with like qualities. Abdeali and his other brothers must be quietly glad that Big Lisper did not do nass on them - otherwise they would be declared little lispers.

Hope this does not run afoul of admins swashbuckling scissors

level_headed
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:02 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2289

Unread post by level_headed » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:34 am

Image
Attachments
Snip20180321_30.png

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2290

Unread post by momeenbhai » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:06 am

yes because faith and deen is some thing which can not be always proved with white and black, a true dai will never go to court. he would choose a mountain peak and let the people search for him.

these guys are far far away from truth and deen.

if I am a true dai I would not even try to convince people about it, my life and my presence would speak on my behalf and people would love and follow my advice without any legal court cases.

alas things are different with these thugs.

they want to prove dai ship to get the wealth and fame. :|

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2291

Unread post by momeenbhai » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:15 am

going to court and trying to convince a Hindu judge about the nass and to expect him to understand it all is the biggest nightmare. :roll:

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2292

Unread post by momeenbhai » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:18 am

mufaddal and his team has worked hard for years to grab power, they wont let go so easily.

his father created this confusion and betrayed taher saifuddin will for a very good reason and that reason is MONEY.

unfortunately, Qutbis will never admit SMB mistake because that will lead to bigger problems for them.

bohraspy
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:17 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2293

Unread post by bohraspy » Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:51 am

level_headed wrote:
Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:34 am
Image
Thank you for posing this brother. But my friends are saying this is not the 100% truth and devious plot by SMS camp. If it's true no comment on the Fatemi sighht so cannot be 100% sure.

HJK
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:20 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2294

Unread post by HJK » Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:05 am

bohraspy wrote:
Thu Mar 22, 2018 4:51 am
level_headed wrote:
Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:34 am
Image
Thank you for posing this brother. But my friends are saying this is not the 100% truth and devious plot by SMS camp. If it's true no comment on the Fatemi sighht so cannot be 100% sure.
This is not only true but there is more to it. There is fumbling and mumbling. Contradictions from the start even in the submission and withdrawal of documents

objectiveobserver53
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 2:29 pm

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2295

Unread post by objectiveobserver53 » Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:35 am

There was a simple misunderstanding. The two questions asked were slightly different. One was if Hurratul Maleka was witness to the writing of Sijil ul Bisharat. To which STF replied No. The second was if she was witness to the authentication of the letter. To which the answer is obviously yes. This was clarified to the judge and he was satisfied with the answer.

Very amusing that no WhatsApp messages have gone out prior to this when the MS loonies suffered numerous scoldings by the judge. Their silence thus far speaks volumes. No messages went out when they tried to present the writing of Majdu as evidence but would not accept SMB Bayan that the writings of Majdu are to be treated with caution!

HJK
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:20 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2296

Unread post by HJK » Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:59 am

objectiveobserver53 wrote:
Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:35 am
There was a simple misunderstanding. The two questions asked were slightly different. One was if Hurratul Maleka was witness to the writing of Sijil ul Bisharat. To which STF replied No. The second was if she was witness to the authentication of the letter. To which the answer is obviously yes. This was clarified to the judge and he was satisfied with the answer.

Very amusing that no WhatsApp messages have gone out prior to this when the MS loonies suffered numerous scoldings by the judge. Their silence thus far speaks volumes. No messages went out when they tried to present the writing of Majdu as evidence but would not accept SMB Bayan that the writings of Majdu are to be treated with caution!
The compilation by majdu was prepared not after he revolted but before that, that is why you see Burhanuddin Maula r a does not say dont believe in everything and anything compiled by majdu (which he could easily have) but be cautious.
The judge was not serious then. What do you have to say about the withdrawl of a couple of contradictory documents submitted.
Could you please exactly tell us when the judge scolded the defendants?

HJK
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2018 1:20 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2297

Unread post by HJK » Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:08 am

objectiveobserver53 wrote:
Thu Mar 22, 2018 6:35 am
There was a simple misunderstanding. The two questions asked were slightly different. One was if Hurratul Maleka was witness to the writing of Sijil ul Bisharat. To which STF replied No. The second was if she was witness to the authentication of the letter. To which the answer is obviously yes. This was clarified to the judge and he was satisfied with the answer
A blatant lie. The judge was not satisfied.

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2298

Unread post by momeenbhai » Thu Mar 22, 2018 8:40 am

Hindu judge is satisfied on nass which he hardly understands? :lol:

Sorry but it seems like this current judge will soon ask to change himself from this case, he already sounds frustrated.

Shams
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 2:08 pm

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2299

Unread post by Shams » Thu Mar 22, 2018 10:58 am

Gautam Patel is an impatient judge, not in a bad way. He does not suffer fools. He definitely believes in expediting the judicial process so the system can resolve more cases and that as the case ages, the proofs and witness accounts become more unclear and muddied, you can clearly see this from the proceedings of other cases too. Loha garam, hatoda maaro is his motto. This game of thrones will become more convoluted when Muffy pops it and whoever takes over from there, not everyone lives to be a 100 years!

I also agree that it is a grave mistake for an outsider to understand the intricacies of our history and opening every chapter of that convoluted history to base decisions on. The basic thing that Plaintiff and Defendant will refuse to believe is that these actors in history were not acting on some divine inspiration who provide an example to follow today but whatever they thought was right for them at that point of time. Think about it, it would be very convenient for the Sulayhids to come up with a letter in light of the power struggle in Cairo to maintain their autonomy considering the whole thing was orchestrated by power hungry generals.

On a side note, watch Wild Wild Country on Netflix, it gives a detailed chronicle of the rise and fall of Osho Rajneesh, who I believe our previous Dai's got inspired by in their bid to explain their Rolls-Royces and their Buicks.

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2300

Unread post by momeenbhai » Thu Mar 22, 2018 11:42 am

cool, do open another thread for netflix, I am always looking for good subject movies.

Reporter
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 11:34 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2301

Unread post by Reporter » Thu Mar 22, 2018 7:44 pm

The Mid-Day report:
High Court judge expresses his impatience with the slow pace of Syedna row

The Bohra community is not the only entity that has been driven to the edge by the long-running Syedna succession feud. Justice Gautam Patel expressed his frustration over the slow progress in the high-stakes case at the Bombay High Court yesterday, while lambasting Syedna contender Taher Fakhruddin for "contradictory" statements....
https://www.mid-day.com/articles/mumbai ... w/19228197
Last edited by Reporter on Sat Mar 24, 2018 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

bohraspy
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:17 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2302

Unread post by bohraspy » Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:29 am

i was thinking midday paper was being paid by STF side. how can they say such bad things about stf? we must complain to them not to say bad things about stf. the case should go on for long time judge shouldnnt end it fast

bohraspy
Posts: 8
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:17 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2303

Unread post by bohraspy » Sat Mar 24, 2018 1:03 am

i heard again that STF was shouted by judge and kicked out of court room... i think the judge is corrupt and should not speak like stf is religious fhead

Vas_anwala
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:24 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2304

Unread post by Vas_anwala » Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:35 am

momeenbhai wrote:
Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:06 am
yes because faith and deen is some thing which can not be always proved with white and black, a true dai will never go to court. he would choose a mountain peak and let the people search for him.
But then how woukd you intern for that role of Anastasia Steel?
these guys are far far away from truth and deen.
They were made to be that way.
if I am a true dai I would not even try to convince people about it, my life and my presence would speak on my behalf and people would love and follow my advice without any legal court cases.
But if you're on mountain peak, how would your presence be felt?
alas things are different with these thugs.
Well after getting the kicking to those four idiots from the jamea, I agree.
they want to prove dai ship to get the wealth and fame. :|
As opposed to what?

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2305

Unread post by momeenbhai » Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:45 am

bohraspy wrote:
Sat Mar 24, 2018 1:03 am
i heard again that STF was shouted by judge and kicked out of court room... i think the judge is corrupt and should not speak like stf is religious fhead
what else do you expect from Indian judiciary? law can be brought in India for peanuts.

this is why going to court was a mistake.....

Vas_anwala
Posts: 36
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:24 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2306

Unread post by Vas_anwala » Sun Mar 25, 2018 2:37 am

momeenbhai wrote:
Sun Mar 25, 2018 12:45 am
[DELETED FOR FOUL LANGUAGE]

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2307

Unread post by momeenbhai » Sun Mar 25, 2018 7:12 am

my reaction when ever a mufaddali tries to interact or shake my hand in real life. :lol: I tend to keep dumb people like mufaddalies at a good distance.
Attachments
landscape-1497435593-washing-hands-close-up.jpg

level_headed
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:02 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2308

Unread post by level_headed » Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:31 pm

If we write in English, it does not get deleted for foul language but we write the same thing in Gujarati, the post gets deleted for foul language. Admin saheb - jawaab do..oh sorry- Please answer
Attachments
Snip20180325_36.png

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2309

Unread post by momeenbhai » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:35 pm

Syedna Burhanuddin also lost his speech in his last days? would this mufaddalis also call him bobro if he would have assign Khuzaima Qutbuddin as the Dai?

Just wondering?

momeenbhai
Posts: 459
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 1:31 am

Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

#2310

Unread post by momeenbhai » Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:37 pm

so whats new?