'Sahih Muslim' contends Bohras are right, rest are misguided

[badrijanab]

Sahih Muslim - Book 020, #4476: "It has been narrated on the authority of 'Abdullah that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: The Caliphate will remain among the Quraish even if only two persons are left (on the earth)."

Should only two person be left on the earth and should both contest for Caliphate then no one can win! Thus one has to have bestows from Allah to be SUPERIMPOSED as Caliph. Hence, Allah appoints "Caliphs" and method of "election" (majority wins) is not way of Allah.

Sunni's "election" (majority) method to elect their caliph is not in compliance with Islam. So their all caliphs are unIslamic except where they are accidentally coinciding with one selected by Allah.

Ithna Asheri line of caliphs ended at Hasan Askari so in absence of leader they too adopted "election" method, which is proven above that this is not in compliance with way of Allah. Thus Ithna Asheri's action post Hasan Askari are not in compliance with the way of Allah.

Only Bohra maslaq obey and recognise the authorised person appointed by Allah i.e. Imam's after Mola Ali a.s. till Imam Mehdi (Mohammed bin Abdullah, the 100th Imam in progeny of Prophet Mohammed saws), so only Bohra maslaq is in compliance with the way of Allah. Should only two person be left on earth = Imam Abul Quasim Mohammed bin Abdullah a.z.s. and someone else then Allah has SUPERIMPOSED and AUTHORISED Imam to be Imam. Allah superimposes rightly guided caliph and Muslim cannot elect someone and confer him title "Rightly Guided". One cannot give something that one don't own, so people have no possession of status of "Rightly Guided" thus they cannot give the same to their elected representative. But Allah owns and he can bestow this title alone. So ab-initio all non-Bohras are astray.

Note: Kothar pretends that they are Bohras but their action are against the teaching of Bohra maslaq thus they don't represent Bohras maslaq. Like Mawiya contends that he represent Islam but fact he is represent only Sunni version and Sunni's. But not the true Islam and its followers, the Shia.

[anajmi]

Unfortunately for you, Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman all belong to the sub clans of Banu Quraish. Even the prophet (saw) belonged to a sub clan of Quraish - Banu Hashim.

What happens if the two people left on earth are both from Quraish? The hadith still remains valid, but now an election comes into the picture.

[Just_a_muslim]

The way we view caliphate is different to the way the companions view it ! These noble men never seemed worldly gains or power , for they had wisdom and weren't really concerned about all these successions !
It was until and after the death if Rasool (saws) that things changed and people started making it a political issue ! And unfortunately , it is the same story today....
What's IMPORTANT is , not the caliphate.... BUT the following the guidance of the Quran and reflecting on the teachings of Rasool(saws) !!
as STATED in THE QURAN !!!

[badrijanab]

What happens if the two people left on earth are both from Quraish? The hadith still remains valid, but now an election comes into the picture.

What happens if both vote for themselves? The hadith still remains valid, election model become useless! Allah will appoint the leader = religious leaders are always; without exceptions, always are appointed only by Allah = sunnat of Rasool.

Election, Shura, Ijtima, etc are all biddat invented by followers of etc, etc & etc, as well as followers Mutah lovers & Moorti upasak. Islam have nothing to do with all these innovations. True Islam = Bohra maslaq.

[anajmi]

Allah will appoint the leader = religious leaders are always; without exceptions, always are appointed only by Allah = sunnat of Rasool.

Which automatically means that Abu Bakr (ra), Umar (ra) and Uthman (ra) were all appointed by Allah = sunnat of Rasool.

Prove wrong!