Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

Lighten up a little and talk about movies, music, books and recipes and more... this forum provides the flip side to the intense and serious discussion taking place in other forums. No topic is off-limit here so long as it is within the accepted norms of decency and decorum.
Post Reply
fustrate_Bohra
Posts: 678
Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:46 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#61

Unread post by fustrate_Bohra » Thu May 07, 2015 8:18 am

araz5253 wrote:
true_bohra wrote: I know you have a very good R&D abilities but with posting this are you backing up the whole matter?

Dont hide it , this is a common understanding since atleast 10 years I am hearing about this. And PDB forum is a clearing house. PDB was the first to break news that mazoon would claim daiship when nobody could even imagine it, almost all predictions coming from this forum came out to be true. So just be patient.
Exactly araz, i had read few articles which was posted roughly around 2000 or 2003 related kqs and it had come out to be true.
Secondly this site has also expose YN, his jealousy towards kqs long long back and this also comes out to be true.

No doubt, if the members are saying Nass on MS is fabricated THEY ARE CORRECT.

Apart from this even if we dont go by members, seeing the lachhan of MS any person with little thinking ability can say that this chap is money and power hungry and NOT AT ALL SUITABLE FOR DAI.
Top
Adam
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:50 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#62

Unread post by Adam » Thu May 07, 2015 10:01 am

Exactly araz, i had read few articles which was posted roughly around 2000 or 2003 related kqs and it had come out to be true.
Secondly this site has also expose YN, his jealousy towards kqs long long back and this also comes out to be true.


It's also because it is now clear that KQ, his children and his followers supported the Progressive movement and have been active on this forum for a long time.
Top
alam
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#63

Unread post by alam » Thu May 07, 2015 11:49 am

Logic exercises

The devil is ugly.
My wife is ugly.
You see, my wife is the devil!

God is love, love is blind.
Stevie Wonder is blind.
Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God.

If you pray, Bongo, God will draw close to you.
God did not draw close to you.
Bongo, you dont pray.

Aristotle is human.
Humans are animals.
Therefore, Aristotle is an animal.

Everything posted on this forum is work of "Reformists" "Progressives" "munafiks"
Araz5253, Adam, James, post on this forum
Therefore, Araz5253, Adam, James, are "Munafiks"
Top
SBM
Posts: 6507
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 4:01 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#64

Unread post by SBM » Thu May 07, 2015 12:16 pm

It's also because it is now clear that KQ, his children and his followers supported the Progressive movement and have been active on this forum for a long time.
So Adam oops Taha BS you have been following same SKQ for last 50 years as Mazoon and you have been active on this forum too so that means you have supported the progressive movement ( Alam has put a very eloquently explained my position)
Last edited by SBM on Thu May 07, 2015 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Biradar
Posts: 1043
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 9:13 pm

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#65

Unread post by Biradar » Thu May 07, 2015 12:25 pm

alam wrote:Logic exercises

Everything posted on this forum is work of "Reformists" "Progressives" "munafiks"
Araz5253, Adam, James, post on this forum
Therefore, Araz5253, Adam, James, are "Munafiks"
Well said, friend alam. Actually, it is true that Adam and James are munafiks. Their "more-la" Mr. Muffadul (LA) disobeyed his father, conspired against the mazoon and then pulled off a coup. Obviously, the followers of this Arch Munafik (LA) can be nothing but munafiks themselves.

Incidentally, More-La (LA) said, while sitting on the takath, that his father's mazoon was doing dushmani for 25 years. However, it is evident that SMB (RA) not only did not act on the mischief of the Iblisi toli, but continued to shower S. Qutbuddin with favors, and took his name in the misaaq. Hence, by his own admission, More-La (LA) broke his misaaq. Now, this Arch Muanfik is leading thousands astray, straight on the path to hell.

But, I suggest to the Admin that they move this thread to the "Humor" section. It really is beyond parody. Lighthearted fun, but not for serious considerations.
Top
JC
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 4:01 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#66

Unread post by JC » Thu May 07, 2015 2:59 pm

Forgive my ignorance, if Adam is Taha BS, who is Taha BS??

Excellent comments by Alam, SBM and Biradar!
Top
Adam
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:50 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#67

Unread post by Adam » Sun May 10, 2015 6:25 am

SBM wrote:
It's also because it is now clear that KQ, his children and his followers supported the Progressive movement and have been active on this forum for a long time.
So Adam oops Taha BS you have been following same SKQ for last 50 years as Mazoon and you have been active on this forum too so that means you have supported the progressive movement ( Alam has put a very eloquently explained my position)
Sure. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Top
araz5253
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:18 pm

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#68

Unread post by araz5253 » Mon May 11, 2015 7:06 am

Adam , what makes you to be on this forum and defend the clergies as most common bohras understand that all the clergies are deeply corrupt ? Personally I am yet to see a bohra who defends the dai successfull , rather they all complain but do not have the courage to leave it. The way you are promoting the dais suggests that you have vested interests may be you are part of saify mahal or the royal family?
Top
Adam
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:50 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#69

Unread post by Adam » Mon May 11, 2015 1:02 pm

araz5253 wrote:Adam , what makes you to be on this forum and defend the clergies as most common bohras understand that all the clergies are deeply corrupt ? Personally I am yet to see a bohra who defends the dai successfull , rather they all complain but do not have the courage to leave it. The way you are promoting the dais suggests that you have vested interests may be you are part of saify mahal or the royal family?
Sure. Whatever helps you sleep at night.
Top
SBM
Posts: 6507
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 4:01 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#70

Unread post by SBM » Tue May 12, 2015 4:44 pm

Adam
Is your new talking point
Sure. Whatever helps you sleep at night. :D :D
Top
araz5253
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:18 pm

Nominating bhai Insaaf S for post of Dai

#71

Unread post by araz5253 » Fri May 15, 2015 1:11 am

I and many others in this forum would agree to make bhai Insaaf as the dai . This is a great time to chirp in as another claimant to dai . We can take advantage of two dawedar fighting for the post of Dai. He is already the head of central board hence can easily claim for the post of dai as neutral amis cure. Both the dawedar can never prove daiship as both don't have any concrete proofs, in which case a neutral person be made dai.

The court could even dig up past cases and even reject daiship of dawood ,Taher saifuddin etc in which case only a central neutral institution like the central board can takeover.
Top
true_bohra
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:19 am

Re: Nominating bhai Insaaf S for post of Dai

#72

Unread post by true_bohra » Fri May 15, 2015 1:19 am

hahaha...what a mockery of your so called movement...I am liking your post araz..it clearly shows how worst an ideology can go but seriously I have a doubt...the way you back Insaf and his post...Arent you Insaf in disguise??? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Top
alam
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: Nominating bhai Insaaf S for post of Dai

#73

Unread post by alam » Fri May 15, 2015 1:42 am

true_bohra wrote:hahaha...what a mockery of your so called movement...I am liking your post araz..it clearly shows how worst an ideology can go but seriously I have a doubt...the way you back Insaf and his post...Arent you Insaf in disguise??? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Araz5253 is none other than one of the hired guns from Kothar who has got all the people on this forum fooled ! It's the same kind of Critical thinking masquerades designed to undermine LEGITIMATE Complaints from people and suppress the voice of dissent by mockery.
Top
araz5253
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:18 pm

Re: Nominating bhai Insaaf S for post of Dai

#74

Unread post by araz5253 » Fri May 15, 2015 5:46 am

alam wrote:
true_bohra wrote:hahaha...what a mockery of your so called movement...I am liking your post araz..it clearly shows how worst an ideology can go but seriously I have a doubt...the way you back Insaf and his post...Arent you Insaf in disguise??? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Araz5253 is none other than one of the hired guns from Kothar who has got all the people on this forum fooled ! It's the same kind of Critical thinking masquerades designed to undermine LEGITIMATE Complaints from people and suppress the voice of dissent by mockery.
hEHHE I am not and my past posts show that up.I have long left the bohra fold years ago. I am serious and I dont understand why admin puts this in "humor" section. I dont believe in daiship , but PDB claims to believe in it so why do they themselves not declare a dai? and who can be better then S Insaaf, or even Mr Poonawala a specialist in Ismaili theories. If the admin thinks this is funny then it they are only mocking themselves. Be the yourself the change(Dai) you want to see in others!
Top
alam
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: Nominating bhai Insaaf S for post of Dai

#75

Unread post by alam » Sat May 16, 2015 4:14 am

araz5253 wrote:. Be the yourself the change(Dai) you want to see in others!
BabDeen is the undisputed Dai.
Top
SBM
Posts: 6507
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 4:01 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#76

Unread post by SBM » Sat May 16, 2015 11:38 am

^
Agree with Alam :D :D :D
Top
araz5253
Posts: 236
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:18 pm

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#77

Unread post by araz5253 » Mon May 25, 2015 7:52 am

what is humorous here?
Top
alam
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:15 pm

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#78

Unread post by alam » Mon May 25, 2015 9:15 am

araz5253 wrote:what is humorous here?
The undisputed Dai here is humorous. Go back and re-group, re-read all the posts in all the threads on this forum. Hard to explain humor. You either get it or you don't.

Just like politics. You are either with us or against us.
Top
babdeen
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 7:07 pm

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#79

Unread post by babdeen » Mon May 25, 2015 2:05 pm

araz5253 wrote:I hear a lot among the reformist circles and other sect people that Muffy and co used body double(s) of Burhanuddin many times which explains why he used to be found on two ziyafats simultaneously as reported by some abdes. So where are the body doubles now?. I also heard that the dawedar has submitted some documents in this regard, Does anyone know the truth of this matter?
[DELETED] They all look like money looting badmas who are using Islam and Bohras to enrich themselves.
These cousin rapping, low life, dysfunctional, corrupt and conniving family is a disgrace to Bohta community. The best way to save Bohra community is to ex-communicate the entire Taher clan. Guys stop wasting your time on who died and who was double of who. [DELETED] [DELETED]
Top
JC
Posts: 1624
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 4:01 am

Re: Evidences for Body doubles of Burhanuddin

#80

Unread post by JC » Mon May 25, 2015 2:56 pm

Fully agree with Babdeen ...............
Top
Post Reply

Return to “The lighter side”