To
Tahera Q and Siblings,
www.fatemidawat.com
This is with reference to the numerous emails, whats app, and text /sms spam that my family and I have received from your fraction since the wafaat of Al-Muqaddas Moula Burhanuddin RA. This is to warn you all to cease and desist from sending us any further spam. We are not interested in your firqa’s offered justification of what is in our eyes is a gross betrayal by your father (Khuzaima Qutbuddin -KQ) of the trust and the high rutba he was bestowed by Al Muqaddas Burhanuddin Moula RA.
Since we have been spammed with so many claims and counter-claims from your firqa, I will list a few of my observations which render’s KQ justifications and explanations as redundant. The falsity of KQ claim is apparent to all mumeneen. Much has already been said by your side and effectively countered by ours.
To avoid repetition of what has been countered before in “53 Reasons” blog, your timing of the claim has removed any doubts in any logical mind that KQ’s claims were only for worldly possessions. I have come across cases where children of a deceased person, have observed atleast 40 days of mourning, as a mark of respect for the deceased, before raking up inheritance issues. Your father didn’t even wait for dafan of Al Muqaddas Moula RA to make his false claim. It’s an action that exposes to the intellectuals that the claim was only for the coffers of Dawat and not out of the duty, love or devotion towards Burhanuddin Moula RA, Dawat or his followers. This is not an action of a civilized person let alone a claimant to the Dai Al Mutlaq position.
While mumeneen were praying for a long and healthy life of Burhanuddin Moula RA, your treacherous clan was busy scheming and preparing for Moula RA’s wafaat. This became evident when your website popped up at the wafaat of Burhanuddin Moula RA. Your clan had reportedly, illegally acquired contact data of worldwide mumeneen and recordings of various occasions. Using the alleged stolen intellectual properties is also not an action of a decent person let alone a claimant to the lofty position of Dai Al Mutlaq.
Your website had to pull down the video that they had put up, where we once again heard our Moula RA say “Bhai Mufaddal par nass nu taj” clearly. There was no further room for any more debate. But since you had embarked on a path of no return, you started grasping for straws. You twisted, cherry picked statements and quotes in the futile hope that it would somehow lay some iota of credence to your clan’s false claim.
Another nail in the coffin of your father’s claim was your father’s inability to layout his legal challenge when it came up before the Mumbai Judge who disclosed that he had the privilege to have received an audience and a tashreef of shawl from Burhanuddin Moula RA earlier. If indeed your father was Burhanuddin Moula RA’s true Mansoos, he would have taken that as a sign of good tidings and would have proceeded. But it appears that your father felt threatened that the Judge would have firsthand knowledge of the great personality and functioning of Burhanuddin Moula RA. It would further dim his scant chances to throw spanner in the normal working of Dawat-e-Hadiyah and sought that his case be heard by some other Judge. This clearly shows that his confidence is elsewhere and not with Burhanuddin Moula RA.
Or perhaps the actual problem is that your father cannot publicly say that although he accepts 51st Dai, he has reservations about the 52nd Dai. Admitting that publicly would effectively destroy the very foundation of his claim to be the 53rd Dai.
To prove his claim that Burhanuddin Moula appointed KQ as his heir since last fifty years, he has to convince mumeneen, to win them over, (and the courts too) that after Burhanuddin Moula RA suffered a stroke, those attending to Burhanuddin Moula RA allegedly staged the Nass on Saifuddin Moula TUS. That changed the ground situation “which denied KQ the portfolios, duties and functions that were managed or entrusted to him by Burhanuddin Moula RA as his so-called successor.
For this, he needs to list out what he was actually deprived of during the last three years pursuant to the Nass. I looked for it, but didn’t find a single important portfolio or duties that Burhanuddin Moula TUS had entrusted to KQ since atleast last 27 -30 years. Amalat, Jamea, Taleem, Kun, Yemen, Mazarat, Qardan Hasanah, Dawat Properties and Trusts, Legal dept , to name a few. The only thing that I came across was that, that he was a figure-head of Shabab ul Iddz Zahabi. As such, he was not involved in any of the Shabab’s activities for decades. KQ was only assigned Ashara Mubaraka and Sherullah khidmat. That khidmat is also assigned to about five hundred plus khidmat guzar every year, there was nothing “heir apparent” about it. So the logical question is why was he not given any of the Dawat’s departments to manage in those fifty years? How is it possible that if Burhanuddin Moula RA appointed your father as his successor, he did not assign him even one significant portfolio or duty! Nor was your father ever found in the khidmat of his Moula RA for most of the last three decades. Nor was he assisting Moula RA in any of Moula RA’s works or tasks.
Jamea and Yemen have always been close to the hearts of Duat Kiraam RA, and Burhanuddin Moula RA chose not to let KQ be associated with either is another precursor that your father had fallen from the grace of Burhanuddin Moula RA. Moula RA entrusted both of these responsibilities to Syedna Aliqader Mufaddal Saifuddin Saheb TUS. “Aaqil ne isharoj kafi che.”
Wouldn’t any predecessor desire his successor to get a feel or grip of the things that he will have to carry on after he succeeds him? Even a small business owner strives to involve his heir in his work so that one day he is familiar and competent enough to manage it. What we realized was, that not only Burhanuddin Moula RA did not give those privileges to KQ, but he had kept your father at arm’s length from the responsibilities of the Dawat’s. These far sighted acts are itself a PROCLAMATION by Burhanuddin Moula RA that your father was never his Mansoos!
Your father was rarely seen with Burhanuddin Moula RA during the last few decades, but we always saw Syedna Aliqader Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS in the shadow of Burhanuddin Moula RA, silently carrying out every wish of Burhanuddin Moula RA and leading mumeneen on the right path.
I believe the most evident change in the stance of Burhanuddin Moula RA towards your father came about 27 years ago after the Africa incidence. Why Burhanuddin Moula RA rebuked his so called successor publicly? If needed, he could have done it privately. Unless KQ’s action were such that must have stretched the limits of Moula RA’s tolerance and Moula RA had apprehension that the unrepentant KQ was likely commit such acts again in the future.
After Moula RA reprimanded KQ in Africa, and KQ remaining unrepentant, we never saw Burhanuddin Moula RA grace KQ with anything except perhaps what basic protocol may have required. We have never seen KQ truly celebrating Milad mubarak of Burhanuddin Moula RA except just filling in his attendance in waaz or functions. Nor we saw him besides Burhanuddin Moula RA in times of challenges, like Bomb at Rozat Tahera, Lanat case etc., nor even in Moula RA’s sickness. When Burhanuddin Moula RA returned to Mumbai after the stroke, KQ fled from Mumbai on the pretext of medical treatment to USA. Whatever the reason he gave then, the truth is evident to us all now. It shows that KQ had blatantly lied then too, it’s definitely not a trait of someone aspiring to be a Dai Al Mutlaq.
So your father was not with Moula RA in celebrating joyous occasions, nor in Ashara Mubaraka, nor when there were challenges, not even when Moula RA suffered the stroke. But the day Moula RA passed away, your father launches a website and claims control of Dawat’s trusts and properties? Can any person with common sense postulate that Moula RA would appoint such an individual as his Mansoos? I can’t.
I believe your clan has forwarded an argument that “Burhanuddin Moula RA did not remove KQ from the rutba of Mazoon.” That is true, but it is a gesture of Burhanuddin Moula RA’s graciousness. By presenting this argument, your clan inadvertently admits that things “behind the curtain” had come to the point where removal of KQ as Mazoon may have been on the table. If removal from Mazoon’s Rutba itself was on table according to your own arguments, then where is the question of appointing him the Mansoos?
Well, for us believers, Saifuddin Moula TUS completed that task on the behalf Burhanuddin Moula RA.!
There are a few among your father’s followers who have natured grudges against some hudood of Burhanuddin Moula RA and some who were looking for a religion of convenience, for those, you do offer them the options to practice that religion of convenience. I can’t see any hope for those. But for the truly misguided souls, I can only pray that may Allah grant those who have gone astray, the taofeeq to see through the selfish motives that your clan has in using them to achieve your personal vendetta, and may they revert back to the rightful path.
Your clan takes great pride in the doctorates and other degrees they that have received. I have seen extracts of the thesis written by your clan that leads readers away from Burhanuddin Moula RA and Dawat-e-Hadiyah. So the writers are not actually the followers but are dissenters of the Dai Al Mutlaq Burhanuddin Moula RA and thereby all his predecessors. Now the very dissenters claim to be the successor of the holy office they dissented, disrespected and disavowed! It’s ridiculous!
Instead of our Al Jamea tus Saifiyah, which Moula RA said was his zaat mubarak, your clan went to other universities to study deen. To me, it’s like going to Arctic Circle to do research on the origins of Kabatullah! I am not trying to demean the education and resources provided by other esteemed institutions, but it’s that, that your actions are not in line with the belief and practices of mumin who goes to his/her Moula for any worldly or deeni matters. There are many others who have procured doctorates and other degrees from various other universities, but they had their original source of deeni ilm from Burhanuddin Moula RA.
Taking this argument forward, lets say, you found better resources in those institutions to do your thesis then perhaps what you could have got from Burhanuddin Moula RA. It meant that you believed that your doctorate guides at the universities had better command on deeni subjects then Burhanuddin Moula RA himself. So if your father inherited from Burhanuddin Moula RA then he too was inferior to your doctorate guides because he could not have more knowledge of deen then his own predecessor. Then perhaps those thesis guides are better suited to be your moula then your own father.
Here are some of the issues that demonstrate to me your clan’s grasping for straws and twisting facts to form devious parallel and mislead.
When your father openly laid this claim, few people who switched allegiance, sent your clan’s drafted letters in which one of the things justifying their switch was comparing themselves to Shohoda e Karbala. Every mumin knows that there cannot not be any parallel between those azeem Shohoda e Karbala and your few mislead followers.
Numerous times Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and Syedna Burhanuddin RA have said in bayan that “Duat Mutlaqeen are not lesser than the Shohoda e Karbala.”
In light of the above bayaan, if your clan brainwashes their followers to perceive themselves as equal to Shohoda e Karbala, that means that all your disciples are of the similar stature of Dai Al Mutlaq. Hence your clan’s man-servant like Shabbir Ujjaini is parallel to your father who claims to be Dai Al Mutlaq. Further, Ujjaini being a “Shohoda” and since women in eman are not allowed to fight battles, you cannot be a Shaheed, therefore Ujjaini being parallel to your father is also your new moula, and so are all of your father’s other male followers. Hence you are actually a “bandi”(a humble servant) of Shabbir Ujjaini and others and not a “shezadi” to them.
Yet you get your “moula ujjaini” to do your daily household chores. Is this how your firqa requires people supposedly of parallel in stature to Shohoda e Karbala and Dai to do household chores for your clan?
Do you expect that mumeneen cannot see through your phony arguments, that you are twisting facts, precedence and misinterpreting deen to suite your convenience? Do you think mumeneen, will ever forgive you for comparing your followers of the likes of Shabbir Ujjaini with the Shohoda e Karbala like Moulana Abbas e Alamdar AS and others? I pray that may Moulana Abbas AS gives you all a befitting reply very soon. Ameen.
No matter what your clan resort to lure people with, what comes to my mind is what Allah said to Iblees; “you will never be able to misguide my true followers.”
If your clan’s objective was to deprive us mumeneen of solace while grieving for our Moula RA, you succeeded. But if the objective was to win over the hearts of mumeneen and /or get control of the coffers of Dawat, you failed miserably.
We all know that your father had called on Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin Moula TUS and had araz his tehniyaat on being appointed Mansoos. KQ had also publicly asserted to the nass on Saifuddin Moula TUS in Toronto waaz and your brother had asserted to the nass in Ujjain waaz. Then whose stupidity drove your clan to do a complete U-turn and embark on this disastrous journey?
Was it because what was initially a sibling rivalry between few Hudood kiram and KQ, turned into KQ’s frustration and hatred for those Hudood? Or when your father lost grace in the eyes of Burhanuddin Moula RA, he took hatred against his own Moula RA? Or was it because you are your siblings were discontent, wanted more money and power, and could not see any role for themselves in Dawat? Did they compel their father to make this false claim and had convinced him that by using internet and media they would “get a pound of flesh for themselves”?
I guess, the time will eventually tell.
Unless you are living in a fictional world, you cannot expect to win these court cases. You may be able to prolong it, but there are no genuine legal grounds for you to win. Once your new followers have been drained by spending their hard-earned money for your vendetta, what will you do then? What would you have gained from this misadventure? I recall someone quoted Adamji Peerbhai chokrao, after losing the court cases, saying “dimag ni masti hati.” Well…., see where it has got them today from where they were once.
I reiterate, your clan’s communication to us is unsolicited. Cease and desist from sending my family any further communication through any means.
And on yes not to forget how u ran away from the court like pussies soon u wud dissappear permenantly!!
and be happy with him in his monkey dance in yemen. 
