#47
Unread post
by progticide » Mon Apr 18, 2011 5:32 am
I know this observation would again be met with the same criticism and refutation. But it is far more important that I illustrate the fallacy of your thoughts, practices and beliefs. You accept it or reject it is a matter of your conscious choice.
On this forum, I have repeatedly come across the threads on the nasihats of Syedi Sadiq Ali Saheb, one of the renowned and revered hudud of the Fatemi Dawat during the 19th century. Participants (especially progressives) have used his nasihats in numerous places on this forum to prove their point of argument.
So what’s the big deal in that?
Someone on this forum has quoted his nasihats to emphasize that Syedi Sadiq Ali Saheb could see the future better than even the Dai and thus he foretold of the ending of the chain of Dai-e-Mutlaq after the 46th Dai. This someone has elevated the position of Syedi Sadiq Ali Saheb above the position of Dai and uses his nasihats to reinforce his argument that the office of Dai e Mutlaq ended with the 46th Dai. This someone is progs favourite protagonist Ms. Mubarak (Liar). For more details you may read some of Mubarak’s exemplary works on this forum.
Another so-called champion of Progressive movement Porus (Porous), an outspoken advocate of the reformist lobby on this forum, always there to defend Mubarak for all her fallacies, uses the nasihats of the same Syedi Sadiq Ali sahib, to deduce that Syedi Sadiq Ali Saheb is a Mushriq (Nauzobillah). For more details read the first post in this thread.
So now all you progs are left with a dichotomy. Or should I call it “Dharam Sankat”.
Dharam Sankat not in the sense that you have to choose between Syedi Sadiq Ali’s greatness and infedilty. Syedi Sadiq Ali Saheb’s eminence does not need a certificate of approval from misguided individuals calling themselves progressive/reformist etc. Dharam Sankat because one of these two prog heroes i.e. Mubarak & Porus, is wrong and thereby misguiding the gullible progressive youngsters.
Ask me, and I am confident that they are both liars and cheats, scratching each other’s back whenever one is feeling a little itchy. But here, it is not about what Dawoodi Bohras think about them. The question is what the progs think about them.
Frankly, I shall not be surprised by your ingenuity if you progs consider both of them correct. Afterall, you have accepted so much rubbish arguments and irrational and false doctrines that anything could be acceptable to you.
But, for a change, as a starter, maybe you would want to contemplate about who between Mubarak and Porus deserves first condemnation.