Page 2 of 2

Re: Unique case: From Akbar’s court in 1591 to Bombay HC

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:06 am
by zinger
araz5253 wrote:So what the HT article itself has mistakes and has wrongly taken names, nevertheless the point to make here is that a past DAWEDAR went all the way to Delhi in those days to get himself declared as Dai and he was successful too, So why blame this current dawedar, whose case is also stronger than the other dawedar muffy?

And actually it proves that none of the dawedars were true nor recieved any "taed" from Imam,, they were making things up to fool the poor gullible bohras. Untill a Jafarbhai came and reformed most of the bohras to Sunni Islam. Actually this goes ever earlier , as even the so called later Imams were fraudulent representatives and had no authorization from Ahlebayt. The real Imamat actually ended with the death of Jafar Sadik AS AND politically it ended with Ali AS himself.

i can understand a typo here and there, but the article was sheer balderdash! 'nuff said

Re: Unique case: From Akbar’s court in 1591 to Bombay HC

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:42 am
by Kaka Akela
[quote]Zinger:
kakaji, i have no issue with you. what have i done to offend you?
my ire was towards the correspondent, not to you. if you felt that i was calling you names, then let me assure you with all sincerity that i was not. let me also apologise to you if you felt that and if i have offended you, but once again, i am not insulting you in any way at all

that said, i have admitted i have very limited knowledge compared to many others here and i really dont understand what you meant by "calls names after someones feeble attempt to offer what he remembers. thanks Bro Zinger.".. if it WRT to the point above, then i assure you once again, my barb is not to you at all, but i apologise again if i have hurt your feelings[/img][/super][/quote]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bro zinger: thank you for clarification even though it was not needed after Bro Biradar's explanation. very kind of you.

Re: Unique case: From Akbar’s court in 1591 to Bombay HC

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 3:57 am
by zinger
kakaji, im glad we cleared the air. i had not seen birader bhai's comment until later.

@ birader bhai, thank you for the support

Re: Unique case: From Akbar’s court in 1591 to Bombay HC

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2015 6:39 am
by araz5253
Zinher it is common even in toi to have such naming gaffles

Re: Unique case: From Akbar’s court in 1591 to Bombay HC

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2015 2:24 pm
by araz5253
both dawedars will continue to remain dawedars