Well, actually I did already bring it on "boyo", but I guess you missed it assuming that it was a generalised statement to the world at large.Bring it on.

Well, actually I did already bring it on "boyo", but I guess you missed it assuming that it was a generalised statement to the world at large.Bring it on.
let us analyse how intelligent the 'believers' of syedna like nalwala are..mustafanalwalla wrote:
You just cannot accept the fact that there are believers in Syedna out there who might be more intelligent....
....then i will say things that are unlike of me
1. because you are an "intelligent believer of syedna" and a superb case study what with your strong orgasmic urges for syedna followed by bouts of arsewiping with sand paper.mustafanalwalla wrote:I must ask you this az. Why you so obsessed with my sexual adventures and my arse?
If living like a king was so very essential then why did Allah (swt) not make every Nabi a king ? The sabak trained adam is well groomed by kothari agents to twist and turn quranic ayats in order to justify the dai's illegitimate and extravagant lifestyle, the crux of the ayats are delibarately not explained !! The fact of the matter is that Allah (swt) purposely made an exception in these cases in order to show to the people that inspite of enormous wealth and power, His TRUE servants would never go astray and would never give importance to wealth over piety and akhlaq, a quality which is thoroughly lacking in the dai. The Nabis never exploited their followers in the name of religion inspite of absolute power and wealth, they were always sincere to their cause. Allah (swt) wanted to show that wealth can never be a hurdle in His worship if the worshipper is honest and devoted to Him.Adam wrote:[color=#0080001. simple life - The Nabi s including Sulaiman and Yusuf Nabi lived like Kings. So did the Fatimid Imams. So did the Fatimid Duaats. .[/color]
from Childhood we have heard thatAdam wrote:[color=#0080001. simple life - The Nabi s including Sulaiman and Yusuf Nabi lived like Kings. So did the Fatimid Imams. So did the Fatimid Duaats. .[/color]
adam, first agree that you are a DABR, i.e. a dawoodi abdebohra regressive, then we progressives will respond, otherwise there is no point in debating anything with you on this forum.Adam wrote:Why aren't any of the True Proggies saying anything. All we hear are the annoying noise of Dawoodi Bohra haters.
Someone is finally showing his true colorshumanbeing wrote:Hey Guys
On a lighter note : What can be the opposite thread name to this one :
"PROGGIES please stand up!" Vs "ABDES please bend down!"
Al Zulfiqar wrote:my reply to adam's directive " PROGGIES PLEASE STAND UP" is this:
"REGRESSIVES PLEASE BEND DOWN" (in sajda of course)
And everyone knows who was the first one to be ashamed of doing it.Adam wrote:We have no problem in bending down. Islam teaches us "submission".
We also "stand up" in pride.
I don't see the "Opposition" or Proggies doing either.
But you're too ashamed to do it. Aren't you?
KID JUST GIVE YOUR SELF FEW YEARS MORE,I AM SURE U WILL REALIZE TRUTH ABOUT THIS PROGRESSIVES.humanbeing wrote:^^ Uff Uff Mirchi,.. !!
adam, you contradict yrself. islam teaches 'submission' and sajda, but only to ALLAH. that is clearly stated in the quran. in fact the slightest disobedience to that basic belief and foundation of islam is termed shirk and the perpetrator is defined as a kafir.Adam wrote:
We have no problem in bending down. Islam teaches us "submission".
When has a commoner bohra mumin stood in pride ? We are always asked to remain bowed down in front of these elites. Pictures are posted all over websites where we see one and sundry bending, bowing in front of shehzadas, amils and even to kids. Where is the pride ?Adam wrote:We also "stand up" in pride.
one very straight questionAl Zulfiqar wrote:adam, you contradict yrself. islam teaches 'submission' and sajda, but only to ALLAH. that is clearly stated in the quran. in fact the slightest disobedience to that basic belief and foundation of islam is termed shirk and the perpetrator is defined as a kafir.Adam wrote:
We have no problem in bending down. Islam teaches us "submission".
but you DABR's do sajda to dai. are you saying that DAI IS ALLAH?
i know you will bring in circuitous crap and refuse to answer straight to the point by asking: what is your belief position, who are your sources, who is your leader etc etc ad nauseum. let me pre-empt you, that is not an answer because you have no answer, no justification for your shirk and kufr.
Allah has repeatedly talk about Adam incident in quraan and how shaitaan rejected to prostrate to ADAM it is 100% sure that Allah is giving some hintAl Zulfiqar wrote:adam, you contradict yrself. islam teaches 'submission' and sajda, but only to ALLAH. that is clearly stated in the quran. in fact the slightest disobedience to that basic belief and foundation of islam is termed shirk and the perpetrator is defined as a kafir.Adam wrote:
We have no problem in bending down. Islam teaches us "submission".
but you DABR's do sajda to dai. are you saying that DAI IS ALLAH?
i know you will bring in circuitous crap and refuse to answer straight to the point by asking: what is your belief position, who are your sources, who is your leader etc etc ad nauseum. let me pre-empt you, that is not an answer because you have no answer, no justification for your shirk and kufr.
ANA BOHRI wrote:Bro Adam
Due respect to your discussion with other fellow member I would kindly request you to stop calling COWARD and stuff like that.It will not serve any purpose.Lets be matured enough and talk sense and discuss in more civilized manner.
Thanks
Your Dai is not Adam and you are not shaitaan.Allah has repeatedly talk about Adam incident in quraan and how shaitaan rejected to prostrate to ADAM it is 100% sure that Allah is giving some hint
Adam Bhai SahebAdam wrote:
But my question remains. What does Al Zulfiqar stand for. Belief (others have made their stance pretty clear eg anajmi (Wahabi/Sunni), Porus (Panjatani) ) It just makes it a bit easier.
He's acting to be a Bohra and yet hates every bit of it. Doesn't that seem a bit weird?
adam, you are now twisting words and shooting blindly in the darkness to justify your kufr. the quran in itself does not "allow" sajdas to anyone, but what it does mention categorically is that sajda is forbidden to anyone except allah. the quran is a book containing the words of allah transmitted through muhammad. the quran is a document and in itself it does not have authority to allow or disallow. it is allah who commanded every word in it, and it was allah who ordered sajdas to adam and yusuf.Adam wrote:@Al Zulfiqar
Sajda, has been discussed before. We accept it as the Quran allowed it to ADAM and YUSUF AS who were both Humans. Please answer on that thread.
However YOU, especially Al Zulfiqar, haven't once (As far as I can remember) showed how proud you are about what you stand for and whom you stand for.
Either shows a coward, or someone who has nothing to be proud of.