Not once. I am not even sure what rafdi means. Does it mean idol worshipper? Cause that I have said many times.How many times have you said here that Shia are rafdi
oh come on bits dar!!! what sane person wouldn't challange the concept of imamat?Biradar wrote:Oh, come on, Mullah Saheb (LA). Please be truthful at least. How many times have you said here that Shia are rafdi, expressed opinions contrary to most fundamental aspects of Shia and Bohra, like being against the concept of Imamat, the dua't mutlaqeen, the concepts of Ismaili philosophy. Please, stop lying at least. I know you for 15 years! Every opportunity, every turn, you have opposed Isamili and Bohra beliefs. Every turn you have used gutter like language to drive out well-meaning folk. Every opportunity you used to attack fundamental Bohra and Shia beliefs, so much so, that people have turned away in disgust. And now, you are acting all offended and want to show you are a white knight! I mean, I really think you are loosing it. How can one sound so earnest and lie so well?anajmi wrote: Not true. A complete lie. Said to hide your own shortcomings. Pretty stupid if you think about it. How do you think I propose to eliminate bohras and shias? By eliminating the corruption that exists in their clergy? By eliminating their slavery? You obviously do not want to eliminate that. Maybe you guys do not deserve anything better than bending and folding hands in front of a conman!!
I believe in existence of god.anajmi wrote:Not once. I am not even sure what rafdi means. Does it mean idol worshipper? Cause that I have said many times.How many times have you said here that Shia are rafdi
More fundamental than any of the concepts you have mentioned is the belief in Allah, whose existence you have denied. So, what does that tell you about yourself? The word "hypocrite" comes to mind. Suitable isn't it?
Allah, Khuada, God. All the same. I have said many times that I consider myself a Bohra, an Ismaili, a Shia. I may sometimes may make fun of some aspects of religion or may appear sarcastic, but honestly, we are too serious on this board. Thats why I think people like Al Zulfikar are valuable as they poke humor in uber-serious Abdes, Qutbis and other assorted fanatics.anajmi wrote:One last question before I apologize for calling you a kafir. Is that God, Allah, or is it some generic god?
Do you include the greatest scholar on Quran, Islam and Bohras, al-aleem, al-rasheed sheikh-ul-faazil anajmi among 'assorted fanatics'?Biradar wrote: Thats why I think people like Al Zulfikar are valuable as they poke humor in uber-serious Abdes, Qutbis and other assorted fanatics.
Well, I apologize for calling you a kafir.Allah, Khuada, God. All the same. I have said many times that I consider myself a Bohra, an Ismaili, a Shia.
No need to reject Allah and his angels at all. Why, we would then have to reject Dumbledore, Gandalf, Superman, Santa Clause et al. Think what a poor world would that be!anajmi wrote: These ignoramuses do not realize that you do not need to be a modern man to reject Allah. Even 14 centuries ago there were people who rejected Allah and his angels.
Rama and Krishna are as fictional as Dumbledore.anajmi wrote:That is the difference between a smart modern man and a stupid modern man. Dumbledore and the others are fictional characters identified as fictional characters by their authors. You would've sounded a little less stupid if you had given the example of Rama or Krishna cause the creators of those at least identify them as real!!
Maybe he is contemplating coming clean on the conspiracy to make MS dai or could it be that he just cannot stand his older brother?dawedaar wrote:Why is Malikul Ashtar bhai saheb conspicuosly absent from California. Didn't see him in any of the pics though his 2 sons are seen! Something is fishy given US is Malik bs territory!