Aethism, Marxism and Religion, which one?
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2002 11:36 pm
Asalaamo Alaikum Warahmatullahi Waberakatuh Brothers and Sisters in Islam
For Allah to coerse a person divests them of their dignity.
Humans in the norm are naturally curious and social creatures. Without interactions, intellectual and physical stimuli, we would go into a state of atrophy, as can be seen by the cases of e.g. the Romanian orphans kept monstrously in orphanages'.
consulting works such as 'Maslow's Hierarchy of needs' makes one aware of Human needs, forefillments and subsequent mental and physical well-being. And here is where one can begin their understanding of God, if one wishes initially to negate religion.
There is also the 'sinister' side to Humans. The greed, jealosy, hunger for power, excessive rivenge, the sometimes ugly result of ones' need to be in authority.
Then theres the Hierarchy of needs as is broadly narrated below:
*Body Needs -medical, emergency, rescue, coping
*Security Needs -safety planning, food supplies, *shelter requirements, emergency supplies
*Social -social self help, finding love, how to
escape bad feelings and alienation, how to
achieve a sense of belonging
*Ego -ego self help, finding healthy pride,
direction, empowerment in business
*Self Actualization -books that give direction
and meaning, supplemented by unique books on
hobbies, politics, science, psychology
Leaving religion aside for a second, How does one achieve all these needs?
Also, another need perhaps not illustrated clearly, is the need to protect and secure the majority of ones off-spring. An instinct highly tuned across the majority of species including ours.
How does one insure this?
In order to achieve the progressive levels of needs and then subsequent forefillment (mental and physical) A whole host of species, have found a common route. Forming interactions with people to work in synergy, collectively sharing material and immaterial values/goods. These interactions form communities, which subsequently form societies.
Now taking into account that Humans are individuals (have variation in thought, reasoning, understanding and behaviours) one needs to regulate these societies in order to create harmony, to prevent distruction, and an eventual denial of the forefillment of ones needs.
So i pose another question- How does on regulate?
We are fortunate in that we live in a time when a large majority of systems and ideaologies have been born, seeded and the fruits been seen.
And what has this shown us?
To me it has amounted, broadly speaking of 4 broad systems.
* Marx'ism -leading to communism
* Capitalism
* Anarchy
* Religion
Now i ask you, which of these is the most plausible? The most just? The one that can stand the test of time?
Marx-ism-
A system that has been shown to fail in Russia, China, North Korea, Quba.....
Why has it failed?
Going back to Hierarchy of needs, and a persons sinister side. This system has led to oppression, dictatorship, crimes of a horrific scale, impoverishment etc. One only has to read what was said in the 20th annual conference in Russia, Lennin was declared a dictator wo commited many crimes. Over-inflatted food prices, mass death due to starvation etc. And another important point, quintessential to Marx-ism, an individual has no possession. The state owns everything, total equality. Then going back to Hierarchy of needs, this does not forefill ones desires, this is innately unjust.
Capitalism-
A system which prospers on the oppression of the third world. A few well off elite,
governing the masses. The masses have eventually revolted as is seen in many cases in
history, ask yourself why? Injustice again. In this system, democracy is key, yet this is an oxymoron. As is seen throughout history, and currently, there is no real sense of the word democracy. I don't even need to justify this. A most basic example, when elections come up, what do the polititions do? They stay clear of campaigns that may jeapordise their seat, even though it may be in the best interests of their constituents. And industries escalating in wealth, yield political power, too big to be de-monopolised.
Anarchy-
Need i comment!
so what is left, by the process of elimination.
Religion - subhanAllah.
Here Insha allah i shall leave it for now, because this area is collosal in size. It can be proven through metaphysics, philosophy, the science of the Quran, which incidentally provides its own falsification test, which for 1400+ years no Aethist, Agnostic or proponent of any other faith as been able to find justified evidence for. what extraordinary genious!
The problems seen in religion lie not in the actual dogma, but in a persons corruption of that dogma in order to forefill their 'sinister side', the need to feel important and the lack of knowledge and especially wisdom that is needed when applying laws. Islam is a multi-faceted intertwinned religion. Dilute the religion by removing some of these facets and then sometimes extreme scenarios are created causing sometimes even extremer repurcussions.
Islam is the middle path, not extremist in the laws as to deny a person their needs, and not
as liberal as say Hedonism, to allow moral and social decay and eventual stagnation.
In Islamic rulings one needs to apply wisdom and even consider the greater of the two evils.
There is also patience, perseverence and tolerance, towards both Muslims and Non-Muslims.
I know to break down society in this way may seem a bit to abstract and academic, but read the events of the past civilisations. See at what point in their cultural, moral, political
stage did they become destroyed or destroy themselves. History in replete with examples, and we have to look at the much broader aspect and come out of just looking at our own lives in the context of a few years to see the reality.
Insha Allah i shall end here, please note that i am no scholar or learned person, so what i say is from myself and if my message conveys a meaning other than that portrayed by the true Islam, i ask forgiveness from Allah, and please feel free to correct any error.
Wasalaamo Alaikum Warahmatullahi waberakatuh
For Allah to coerse a person divests them of their dignity.
Humans in the norm are naturally curious and social creatures. Without interactions, intellectual and physical stimuli, we would go into a state of atrophy, as can be seen by the cases of e.g. the Romanian orphans kept monstrously in orphanages'.
consulting works such as 'Maslow's Hierarchy of needs' makes one aware of Human needs, forefillments and subsequent mental and physical well-being. And here is where one can begin their understanding of God, if one wishes initially to negate religion.
There is also the 'sinister' side to Humans. The greed, jealosy, hunger for power, excessive rivenge, the sometimes ugly result of ones' need to be in authority.
Then theres the Hierarchy of needs as is broadly narrated below:
*Body Needs -medical, emergency, rescue, coping
*Security Needs -safety planning, food supplies, *shelter requirements, emergency supplies
*Social -social self help, finding love, how to
escape bad feelings and alienation, how to
achieve a sense of belonging
*Ego -ego self help, finding healthy pride,
direction, empowerment in business
*Self Actualization -books that give direction
and meaning, supplemented by unique books on
hobbies, politics, science, psychology
Leaving religion aside for a second, How does one achieve all these needs?
Also, another need perhaps not illustrated clearly, is the need to protect and secure the majority of ones off-spring. An instinct highly tuned across the majority of species including ours.
How does one insure this?
In order to achieve the progressive levels of needs and then subsequent forefillment (mental and physical) A whole host of species, have found a common route. Forming interactions with people to work in synergy, collectively sharing material and immaterial values/goods. These interactions form communities, which subsequently form societies.
Now taking into account that Humans are individuals (have variation in thought, reasoning, understanding and behaviours) one needs to regulate these societies in order to create harmony, to prevent distruction, and an eventual denial of the forefillment of ones needs.
So i pose another question- How does on regulate?
We are fortunate in that we live in a time when a large majority of systems and ideaologies have been born, seeded and the fruits been seen.
And what has this shown us?
To me it has amounted, broadly speaking of 4 broad systems.
* Marx'ism -leading to communism
* Capitalism
* Anarchy
* Religion
Now i ask you, which of these is the most plausible? The most just? The one that can stand the test of time?
Marx-ism-
A system that has been shown to fail in Russia, China, North Korea, Quba.....
Why has it failed?
Going back to Hierarchy of needs, and a persons sinister side. This system has led to oppression, dictatorship, crimes of a horrific scale, impoverishment etc. One only has to read what was said in the 20th annual conference in Russia, Lennin was declared a dictator wo commited many crimes. Over-inflatted food prices, mass death due to starvation etc. And another important point, quintessential to Marx-ism, an individual has no possession. The state owns everything, total equality. Then going back to Hierarchy of needs, this does not forefill ones desires, this is innately unjust.
Capitalism-
A system which prospers on the oppression of the third world. A few well off elite,
governing the masses. The masses have eventually revolted as is seen in many cases in
history, ask yourself why? Injustice again. In this system, democracy is key, yet this is an oxymoron. As is seen throughout history, and currently, there is no real sense of the word democracy. I don't even need to justify this. A most basic example, when elections come up, what do the polititions do? They stay clear of campaigns that may jeapordise their seat, even though it may be in the best interests of their constituents. And industries escalating in wealth, yield political power, too big to be de-monopolised.
Anarchy-
Need i comment!
so what is left, by the process of elimination.
Religion - subhanAllah.
Here Insha allah i shall leave it for now, because this area is collosal in size. It can be proven through metaphysics, philosophy, the science of the Quran, which incidentally provides its own falsification test, which for 1400+ years no Aethist, Agnostic or proponent of any other faith as been able to find justified evidence for. what extraordinary genious!
The problems seen in religion lie not in the actual dogma, but in a persons corruption of that dogma in order to forefill their 'sinister side', the need to feel important and the lack of knowledge and especially wisdom that is needed when applying laws. Islam is a multi-faceted intertwinned religion. Dilute the religion by removing some of these facets and then sometimes extreme scenarios are created causing sometimes even extremer repurcussions.
Islam is the middle path, not extremist in the laws as to deny a person their needs, and not
as liberal as say Hedonism, to allow moral and social decay and eventual stagnation.
In Islamic rulings one needs to apply wisdom and even consider the greater of the two evils.
There is also patience, perseverence and tolerance, towards both Muslims and Non-Muslims.
I know to break down society in this way may seem a bit to abstract and academic, but read the events of the past civilisations. See at what point in their cultural, moral, political
stage did they become destroyed or destroy themselves. History in replete with examples, and we have to look at the much broader aspect and come out of just looking at our own lives in the context of a few years to see the reality.
Insha Allah i shall end here, please note that i am no scholar or learned person, so what i say is from myself and if my message conveys a meaning other than that portrayed by the true Islam, i ask forgiveness from Allah, and please feel free to correct any error.
Wasalaamo Alaikum Warahmatullahi waberakatuh