Even the history of earlier Muslim rulers who ruled over India has been drastically changed. They are portrayed as the arch enemies of Hindus who allegedly killed many hindus and also looted and plundered their temples. Many historians have proved them entirely wrong and even furnished evidences to show that those Rulers actually gifted vast tracts of land to hindu temples and that the key positions in their military and administration were held by hindus. Hence if they acted so violently against hindus then why did their militaries under the Rajput commanders not rebel ? There is enough material available on the internet to substantiate these claims hence I won’t elaborate further. However one cannot totally absolve these rulers for their alleged crimes which may or may not have been committed. The fabricated history is part of the greater plan of the saffron brigade like RSS and its affiliates to divide the nation on communal grounds, a fact which is more evident from the recent Gujarat mass genocide, Babri Masjid demolition and various other hindu/muslim riots engineered by the RSS stooge like BJP, VHP and Bajrang Dal. How many of our children even know that the father of the nation, Mahatma Gandhi was assassinated by a leading RSS functionary Nathuram Godse ? How many of them even know that Godse had disguised himself as a Muslim, complete with a muslim cap, sherwani and false beard to trigger a hindu/muslim riot ? Some historians even state that Godse had circumcised himself to establish a false Muslim identity and trigger communal riots incase he was shot down. If it was not for the late politician, Shri Gadgil who recognised Godse and screamed at him at that very moment thereby recognising Godse then India would have seen a riot of such vast magnitude which could over shadow all the future riots put together.
In brief, I only wanted to show as to how history is played with and manipulated by vested interests to further their own evil agendas. The same is the case with regard to religious history and we are still witnessing the after effects of some of its distorted versions which has resulted in mass killings between followers of the same Ummah be it Shia or Sunni.
Hence it is extremely important to verify historical contents from all angles by reading its versions from its writers as well as its critics. Atleast people can do it when it concerns a Country or a Religion as the same are open for scrutiny but what about Bohra history which has ONLY the positives, the reason being that the same is written by bohras alone and no historian or scholar was allowed to scrutinise it. Lets take the example of the Dai Qutubkhan Qutbuddin known as Qutbuddin shaheed. We bohras are told that he alongwith hundreds of his followers were killed by Aurangzeb. What is the truth ? If according to bohras, he was allegedly killed by Aurangzeb then is there any mention of it in any of Aurangzeb’s historical literature ? Even after a lot of surfing and interacting with some historians I couldn’t find any evidence to prove the same. The only version available is the Bohra version which is written by a bohra, verified by a bohra, approved by a bohra. I couldn’t find any NEUTRAL source which could prove the alleged killings. Although there are many literatures written by Indian and foreign historians which do mention the alleged killing of Dai Qutubkhan Qutbuddin by Aurangzeb but the “Source” of reference is ALWAYS the one provided by Bohra writers and not any neutral source. There could have been many killings ordered by Aurangzeb but this particular one finds no mention in ANY of Aurangzeb’s texts verified and authenticated by Indian or foreign scholars/historians. Even if we presume that a stray incident concerning a miniscule community could not have been highlighted but then how can the killings of so many bohras alongwith Dai Qutubkhan go unnoticed ? According to bohra version this was a mass killing, a mass genocide. How can such a mass genocide be overlooked by every scholar, archaeologist, researcher and historian ? The bohra version also hinges on the alleged hatred of the entire shia community by Aurangzeb. To understand this, one has to read certain historical facts….. “Aurangzeb was born to Mumtaz Mahal, a Shia wife of Shah Jehan. His uncle (mamoo) Shayasta Khan was Shia and a very important commander of his army. His another notable commander Mir Jumla was also Shia. Other important Shia commanders such as Ruhullah Bakshi al Mumalik and Mir Atish belonged to the Iranian Safavi family. Aurangzeb married his son Azam Shah with Princess Shehar Bano of Bijapur Kingdom. She was a Shia. Aurangzeb’s eldest son Mohammad Sultan was married to princess of Qutb Shahi king who was also a Shia. With such intertwining kinship ties with Shias, it is inconceivable that Aurangzeb could think of taking upon certain kingdom merely because they were headed by Shias. It all boils down to the fact that Aurangzeb’s assault on Deccan Muslim kingdoms was motivated by political reasons rather than any enmity with Shias. It was British trained historian Jadunath Sarkar who concocted the theory of Aurangzeb being anti-Shia while interpreting his assault on Deccani Muslim kingdoms”.
Before the likes of ‘Pristinophobia’ effected people and others jump the bandwagon and label me a wahabi for stirring the hornet’s nest, let me make it clear that Iam no fan of Aurangzeb. According to me Aurangzeb was just a king like many others who ruled over India and he too had his bad and good side, he was not an Islamic scholar nor was he an Islamic leader. He too was capable of committing crimes as he was not infallible. This subject is only of academic interest as there are many other versions of bohra history which too are highly questionable. One of them is the story of ‘Sawa Mann’ (1.25 quintal) ‘Janoi’ (brahmin’s sacred thread) which was alleged to have been removed from hindu Brahmins in one sitting.
By questioning the alleged killings, Iam in no way casting aspersions on the late Dai Qutubkhan Qutbuddin. Iam not questioning his honesty and integrity as he could well be a person of impeccable character and shahadat or no shahadat does not demean his great personality. The crux of the matter is the historical records which finds no mention in any of the research carried out by noted Indian or foreign historians who have done extensive research on the life of Aurangzeb. If there are any authentic and reliable contrarion records to nullify these claims then they are most welcome and I would gladly stand corrected.
If we do not verify the bohra history from neutral sources and question its authenticity then the day is not far when our children and grandchildren will be thrust with false history which will ONLY glorify the 51st and 52nd dai alongwith mansoos to such an extent that our siblings will totally forget Panjatan Pak (a.s.). We have been hearing such unbelievable fairy tales in recent times like the one wherein Mansoos claims to have heard his brother Hozy speaking to him from grave and assuring him that he is in the company of Panjatan Pak (a.s.) hence Mansoos need not worry. Mansoos also claims to have a version of an alleged conversation between Imam Hussain (a.s.) and his Ghoda taken place just before Shahadat of Imam Hussain (a.s.). Then there are the infamous “Baar Ragda”, “Lokhand na joota worn by Shimr” and “Bootha khanjar used by Shimr” which finds no place even in the mainstream Shia version of the battle of Karbala. In future there could be voluminous false documents to prove that the 51st and 52nd Dais were the most honest and extremely pious and lived a life full of piety although the facts are totally the opposite. There will be multiple editions of the Dai’s false mojizas and some of which will even portray him as a superman at the age of 100, he will be shown to have defeated Usain Bolt in 100 meter sprints at the age of 102
. Even Narendra Modi would be portrayed as a saint in order to justify the Dai’s felicitation and his gift of over Rs.One crore to Modi thereby erasing the nightmarish massacre of thousands of Muslims under Modi’s rule. With the type of advance technology at their disposal, Mansoos could well come up with a tampered and fictitious video clip showing the 52nd Dai doing nass on him (in clear and audible speech) in the hospital although the Dai was in no position to speak. There could be hundreds of such cases wherein Bohra history could be distorted as part of their nefarious designs to fulfil their evil agenda. Hence I request members to view this post with an unbiased mind, question the authenticity of Bohra history if it is not supported by neutral sources and try to explore the truth.P.S. I request the followers of so called "Pristine" faith and abde syednas not to derail the thread by harping on Aurangzeb's other killings as they are freely available on the internet alongwith its rebuttals but if they so insist then focus only on the Dai's alleged killings as this is a part of the subject issue regarding the authenticity of Bohra history.
This does happen when lie is filled in ones heart.
![[img]http://img856.imageshack.us/img856/1064/l9tm.jpg[/img]](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/856/l9tm.jpg/){kind=link}