An Islamic perspective against animal sacrifice
Every year, with the onset of Hajj and it's accompanying 'Id celebration, as well as that of the 'Id al-Fitr, the issue of animal sacrifice, and subsequently, that of meat consumption in the Islamic world, rises to the foreground, both amongst Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
For many in the Islamic world, this issue is a sensitive one. Still reeling from years of colonialism, every aspect of Tradition (whether legitimate or perceived) becomes a rallying point against further western conquest.
For not only are wars for self determination, and basic human rights still being fought by Muslims around the world but in addition to these physical struggles - both in the East, and even more so for those Muslims living in the West, the struggle for the heart, mind and soul of each believer within the Religion of Islam is a continual battle. Everywhere we turn, our faith is both subtly and overtly belittled, and we are continually pressured to adopt western ways, to assimilate to the so called "more civilized culture".
Meanwhile, many well meaning individuals in the western world fall victim in their own way to this legacy of colonialism, and even more so to the legacy of the Crusades. Stereotypes of the Muslim world are so entrenched in western culture, that many tolerant, opened minded people, who would ordinarily never seek to demean an entire segment of humanity (be it a religious, cultural, or racial group) do so nonetheless as if it's almost second nature (apparently not even recognizing they're doing it) when it comes to Islam.
Rather than viewing Islam as the legitimate heir and continuation of the Judeo-Christian culture with which it itself is connected (seeing itself not only as the primordial root of the Abrahamic tradition, but also as the culmination of it), it is continually relegated to the realm of some backwoods phenomenon - a primitive culture and spirituality, outside the pale of the enlightenment with which the west claims as it's own - unaware that it is in fact this very religion (Islam), and it's ensuing culture that lead to many of the advancements in human knowledge that are now synonymous with civilization itself.
In relation to the discussion of animal welfare, this tendency amongst westerners usually places the Islamic world as the "Barbaric Other", an isolated domain whose population is perceived as being steeped in superstition, and somehow outside the realm of reason and intellectual discussion, thus making it an inpenatabrale wilderness, viewed as forever lost territory. When contact is made, it is usually done so begrudgingly and in a condescending manner - a sort of last ditch effort to "save the savages from themselves".
Rather than seeing Islam and it's ensuing culture as being of the same level of complexity and diversity as their own religious beliefs and traditions, we are viewed as a remote and distant minority population, whose oppions are assumed to be one and the same, that is, backwards and irelavent (even though in reality we represent one of the largest blocks of humanity with an equally diverse range of oppinions).With this in mind, it is ultimately up to us as Muslims to take the first step, to speak out about pressing issues of ethics and morality, both for the sake of our own community and it's continual advancement with the rest of humanity, as well as to clear up misconceptions in the western world that ultimately hurt us all. For it is ONE world. And if we are to better the planet in which we live, it is going to take mutual respect and cooperation between all of Mankind.
So let us begin by addressing the issue that is perhaps one of the major objections which people of conscious have towards Islam (as they see it) and that is the ritual slaughter of animals.
Sacrifice is not a pillar of Islam. Nor is it obligatory during Hajj, it's accompanying 'Id or the 'Id al-Fitr. This is not to say that it did not, or does not happen. However, we must look at the occurrences in a contextual manner, understanding not only the pre-Islamic institution of sacrifice, the Quranic reforms concerning this practice, and the continuance of sacrifice in the Muslim world, but also the nature in which the Quranic revelations occurred. For it seems that with many people, both non-Muslims and Muslims alike, context is the key that they are missing.
The Quran did not get 'sent down' as a blueprint for human society, with a list of do's and don'ts that were to be magically implemented overnight to form a utopian world. Rather, it came over a period of 22 years, sometimes in answer to the Prayers of the Prophet (sal), other times in relation to a circumstance within the community, to questions that the faithful had regarding a particular practice etc., and always with the goal of helping the faithful strive to further know Allah and to live in harmony with both the heavens and the earth. So in this context, one can say that the Quran represents the compilation of teachings that came in response and in relation to the time and place scenario's with which they were dealing with. However, getting deeper into the essence of these teachings, we must also take into account that the Quran itself refers to those verses as having allegorical meanings behind the apparent literal ones. So in this context, we must acknowledge that the inner meanings of the verses are applicable to situations outside of those to which the outward meanings pertain.
With this in mind, let us start with the situation as was in pre- Islamic Arabia in regards to animal sacrifice. Not only did the Pagan Arabs sacrifice to a variety of Gods in hopes of attaining protection or some favor, or material gain, but so too did the Jews of that day seek to appease the One True God by blood sacrifice and burnt offerings. Even the Christian community felt Jesus to be the last sacrifice, the final lamb so to speak, in an otherwise valid tradition of animal sacrifice (where one's sins are absolved from the blood of another).
Islam however broke away from this long standing tradition of appeasing an "angry God" and instead demanded personal sacrifice and submission as the only way to die before death and reach 'Fana' or 'extinction in Allah.' The notion of 'vicarious atonement of sin' (absolving one's sin's through the blood of another) is nowhere to be found in the Quran. Neither is the idea of gaining favor by offering the life of another to God. In Islam, all that is demanded as a sacrifice is one's personal willingness to submit their ego and individual will to Allah.
One only has to look at how the Quran treats one of the most famous stories in the Judeo-Christian world: the sacrifice of Isaac - here, in the Islamic world seen as the sacrifice of Isma'il - to see a marked difference regarding sacrifice and whether or not Allah is appeased by blood. The Quranic account of the sacrifice of Isma'il ultimately speaks against blood atonement.
37:102-107 Then when (the son) Reached (the age of) (Serious) work with him He said: "Oh my son!" I see in vision That I offer thee in sacrifice: Now see what is Thy view!" (The son) said: "Oh my father! Do As thou art commanded: Thou wilt find me, If Allah so wills one Practicing Patience and Constancy!" So when they had both Submitted their wills (to Allah), And he had laid him Prostrate on his forehead (For sacrifice), We called out to him, "Oh Abraham!" "Thou hast already fulfilled The vision!" thus indeed Do we reward those who do right. For this was obviously A trial And We ransomed him With a momentous sacrifice"
Notice that the Quran never says that God told Abraham to kill (sacrifice) his son. Though subtle, this is very important. For the moral lesson is very different than that which appears in the Bible.
Here, it teaches us that Abraham had a dream in which he saw himself slaughtering his son. Abraham believed the dream and thought that the dream was from God, but the Quran never says that the dream was from God. However, in Abraham and Isma'il's willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice Abraham of his son, Isma'il of his own life - they are able to transcend notions of self and false attachment to the material realm, thus removing a veil between themselves and Allah, enabling Allah's mercy to descend upon them as the Spirit of Truth and illuminate them with divine wisdom (thus preventing a miscarriage of justice and once and for all correcting the false notion of vicarious atonement of sin).
For certainly, the ever merciful, most compassionate, would never ask a father to go against His command of "thou shall not kill" and kill his own son in order to be accepted by Him. For the Quran teaches us that God never advocates evil (See 7:28 and 16:90) and that only Satan advocates evil and vice (24:21). The notion that Allah would want us to do an immoral act runs counter to Allah's justice.
As far as the yearly tradition that has followed this event (that is the sacrificing of a Ram to commemorate Abraham and Isma'il's' great self sacrifice), we must understand it, and the Quranic verses that pertain to animal sacrifice, in relation to the time and place circumstances in which these revelations came, and how people were trying to make a personal sacrifice by sharing their limited means of survival with the poorer members of their community.
That is to say, the underlying implication of Islam's attitude towards ritual slaughter is (as explained earlier) not that of blood atonement, or seeking favor with God through another's death, but rather, the act of thanking God for one's sustenance and the personal sacrifice of sharing one's perceived possessions and valuable food with their fellow man. The ritual itself is NOT the sacrifice. It is merely a method of killing where the individual kills as quickly as possible and acknowledges that only Allah has the right to take a life, and that they do so as a humble member of Allah's creation in need of sustenance just like every other species in Allah's creation.
So let us examine some of the appropriate verses in the Quran to see what it has to say about sacrifice and how it related to life in 500 C.E. Arabia (Also included is commentary by Yusuf Ali - to show that even someone who was pro- sacrifce and coming from an understanding that saw animals as subject to Man, did not champion wanton cruelty or notions of blood atonement.):
22:33 In them* ye have benefits For a term appointed: In the end their place Of sacrifice is near The ancient house
*"In them; in cattle or animals offered for sacrifice. It is quite true that they are useful in many ways to man, e.g., camels in desert countries are useful as mounts or for carrying burdens or for giving milk, and so for horses and oxen; and camels and oxen are also good for meat and camels hair can be woven into cloth; goats and sheep also yield milk and meat, and hair or wool. But if they are used for sacrifice, they become symbols by which men show that they are willing to give up some of their own benefits for the sake of satisfying the needs of their poorer brethren" (Yusuf Ali commentary)
22:34 To every people did We Appoint rites (of sacrifice) That they might celebrate The name of Allah over The sustenance He gave them From animals (fit for food)*, But your God is One God: Submit then your wills to Him (In Islam): and give thou The good news** to those who humble themselves
* "This is the true end of sacrifice, not propitiation of higher powers, for Allah is One, and He does not delight in flesh and blood, but a symbol of thanksgiving to Allah by sharing meat with fellow men. The solemn pronouncement of Allah's name over the sacrifice is an essential part of the rite" (Yusuf Ali commentary)
** The good news: i.e., the Message of Allah, that he will accept in us the sacrifice of self for the benefits of our fellow men. (Yusuf Ali commentary)
22:37It is not their meat Nor their blood that reaches Allah: it is your piety That reaches Him: He Has thus made them subject To you, that ye may glorify Allah for His guidance to you: * And proclaim the Good news To all who do right
* "No one should suppose that meat or blood is acceptable to the One True God. It was a Pagan fancy that Allah could be appeased by blood sacrifice. But Allah does accept the offering of our hearts, and as a symbol of such offer, some visible institution is necessary. He has given us power over the brute creation and permitted us to eat meat, but only if we pronounce His name at the solemn act of taking life, for without this solemn invocation, we are apt to forget the sacredness of life. By this invocation, we are reminded that wanton cruelty is not in our thoughts, but only the need for food." (Yusuf Ali commentary)
It is quite clear from the Quranic passages above that the issue of animal sacrifice is in relation to the role animals played in Arabian society at that place and time (as well as other societies with similar climates and culture), in that Man is commanded to give thanks to Allah and praise Allah for the sustenance he has given them and that they should sacrifice something of value to them to demonstrate their appreciation for what they have been given (which in their case were the very animals from which their survival was based).
The rites of sacrifice are specific to that which Allah has given to Man for his sustenance. The assumption that such sustenance is always meant to be of the four legged variety is incorrect. Much evidence suggests that early man was primarily vegetarian, as Genesis states "I have given you every herb bearing seed for food." In fact, according to the Bible, it was only after The Flood that mankind was permitted to eat flesh (presumably for survival reasons), as their normal food would have been scarce. And from time and place and from culture to culture, what is present for survival varies. Native American tribes in Alaska and Northern Canada had access to just fish, seals and whales etc. Certain Island people's only had fish. While still other populations remained vegetarian, eating primarily fruit and nuts.
Nowhere in the Quran does it suggest that these people who do not need to eat meat to survive, or those who eat meat but do not have access to