silvertongue wrote:My brother if there was any way to solve this issue then Shia and Sunnis wouldn't have been fighting since 1400 years.. No matter how the approach or whatever the proofs.. There is no end to it.
Do Shia ever wonder after Ghadir Mansoos Ali should have become no.2 for last 6 months of Prophet's life.
Why were Ansars gathered at Sakifa, didn't they know Prophet had already appointed Ali as their Maula? Why didn't Prophet ask Ali, his appointed Mansoos to lead prayers and run affairs of Muslim in his absence due to illness.
Read this
Rational proofs which refute the Shia myth of taking Ali(ra) as a divinely appointed Caliph.
Rational Proof #1:
The occurrence of incident of Saqifah itself is an irrefutable proof that, there wasn’t a divine Caliph after Prophet(saw) nor was there a Caliph appointed by Prophet(saw).
Rational Proof #2:
Allegations Against Uthman(ra) Disproves Wilayat of Ali(ra)
Rational Proof #3:
Letter of Ali(ra) to Mu’awiya(ra) disapproves that, Ali(ra) considered himself to be divinely appointed Caliph.
Rational Proof #4:
Ali(ra) not making takfeer of those who fought against him proves that he was wasn’t divinely appointed Caliph.
Rational Proof #5:
Ali(ra) refutes his supposed Caliphate after Prophet, while refuting Ansar.
Conclusion:
Hence in the light of above mentioned rational proofs it is proven, that the Caliph after Prophet(saw) wasn’t going to be a divinely appointed person from progeny of Prophet(i.e Ali). These are some important facts which readers should ponder over, in order to analyze the reality regarding the false claim of Shi’ites that Ali(ra) was divinely appointed Caliph by Allah or Prophet.
Allah(swt) states in his Book: No soul can believe except by Allah’s will, and He brings disgrace on those who do not use their reason.(Quran 10:100).
Read all this at
http://youpuncturedtheark.wordpress.com ... ed-caliph/