Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court

The one and only free public forum for Bohras. The focus of this forum is the reform movement, the Dawoodi Bohra faith and, of course, the corrupt priesthood. But the discussion is in no way restricted to the Bohras alone.
salsabeel
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:38 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#241

Unread post by salsabeel » Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:09 pm

The abdes are circulating msgs that the judge got' wahye' and thus opted out of the case. fateh mubin! dont they realize MS and company wanted this judge? I sometimes feel that these people live in a distorted reality. The judge gave his opinion of settling the case out of court. SKQ was of the same mindframe, infact invited SMS for a talk a long while ago. SMS refused then, as well as now in front of the judge. So in conclusion, it is SMS and party who opted for a court battle, due to ignoring all attempts at resolving the issue outside of court by SKQ.

salsabeel
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:38 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#242

Unread post by salsabeel » Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:15 pm

watsapp msg:

Mufaddal bhaisab keeps saying that Mawlana Burhanuddin is no ordinary person. Of course he is not. He is our Mawla and Dai of Imam.
But:
-firstly, the point is if Mawlana Burhanuddin had indeed spoken as they described in hospital, of course it would have been reported to the hospital, and
-secondly if this was a mu'jiza as they are now saying, why didn't they say so in the first place. How did the shezadas not report this as a mu'jiza to all mumineen!! Obviously. If there is a theft going on it is not the people doing the burglary who turn the lights on

ghulam muhammed
Posts: 11653
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:34 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#243

Unread post by ghulam muhammed » Tue Apr 08, 2014 3:35 pm

true_bohra wrote:Isn't this a big blow to KQ camp. When I told that the court would not entertain such petition with loose evidence and its not the matter of 700 pages petition as the court looks for testimonies, evidence and explicit statements which were absent.
What made you say that the court would not entertain such petition ? Has the Honourable Court thrown out the case ? Has the case not been admitted in the first place ? Has the date for the next hearing not been given ? So how could anyone even say that the court would not entertain such a petition ?

adna_mumin
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 3:43 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#244

Unread post by adna_mumin » Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:00 pm

One gets the clear feeling that

One side has played all their cards London, Letter, Laanat, Lame and Lost (dare i say in Lies)
The other side is being Slow, Sometimes subtle, Steady, Smart and most importantly Sure of what they say.

And the other feeling is there are clear, admissible in court documentary evidence that they ultimately did go ahead and file the suit. May Haq prevail. Aameen.
And Insha Allah ta the deceit of Baatil will stand clearly exposed at least once and for all for our era.

ghulam muhammed
Posts: 11653
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:34 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#245

Unread post by ghulam muhammed » Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:02 pm

The next hearing of this case is on 29.4.2014 and the judge will be HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G.S. PATEL

ghulam muhammed
Posts: 11653
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:34 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#246

Unread post by ghulam muhammed » Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:00 pm

What actually happened in the London Hospital :
Actually Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin tried to say NURSE and poor Mufaddal bhaisaab heard it wrongly as NASS :mrgreen:

watsup msg.


monginis
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:00 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#248

Unread post by monginis » Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:52 pm

ghulam muhammed wrote:What actually happened in the London Hospital :
Actually Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin tried to say NURSE and poor Mufaddal bhaisaab heard it wrongly as NASS :mrgreen:

watsup msg.
hilarious, I am looking forward to subscribe such messages. :mrgreen:

monginis
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:00 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#249

Unread post by monginis » Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:01 pm

It was good that SMB was in London when he got paralyze attack, if he was in INDIA they would easily bribe doctors and submit in writing whatever they require to.

Bohra spring
Posts: 1377
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:37 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#250

Unread post by Bohra spring » Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:31 am

I don't think the case is dismissed , but the court is setting expectations that it is a very difficult case for it to intervene

That does not mean SMS is right it just means it can never be logically or transparently proved

Abdes just have to accept it that they have to blindly follow SMS , while SKQ had to object . End if day it is the followers decision where they want to go.

S. Insaf
Posts: 1494
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 4:01 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#251

Unread post by S. Insaf » Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:56 am

Reply to uncle’s petition by April 29, high court tells Syedna
TIMES OF INDIA TNN | Apr 8, 2014, 11.43 PM IST
MUMBAI: The HC has posted to April 29 the hearing in a suit filed by the recently ordained Syedna's uncle, Khuzema Qutbuddin, to declare him the Dawoodi Bohras' religious head.

On Tuesday, Justice Gautam Patel before whom the matter came for hearing also offered to recuse if the parties have objection. He said he personally knew two Bohras. After he spelt their names, the parties said they have no objection to him hearing the matter. Justice Kathawalla had recused himself from the matter on Monday as he had appeared for the late Syedna in an ex-communication case.

Qutbuddin's advocate Ravi Kadam said Syedna Muffaddal Saifuddin had sought two weeks to reply to his uncle's plea for ad interim relief. Qutbuddin wants access to documents relating to the community and restraint on the Saifuddin from acting as the spiritual head. Saifuddin's advocate Janak Dwarkadas said "it is not a matter for ad interim relief", as more time is required to go through the "774-page plea". Kadam said his client wants "certain access and disclosure".
Justice Patel granted Saifuddin time to file a "limited" reply opposing ad interim relief to his uncle.

Fatema MN
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 1:26 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#252

Unread post by Fatema MN » Wed Apr 09, 2014 12:58 am

Reply to uncle’s petition by April 29, high court tells Syedna:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city ... 463462.cms

Bombay High Court to hear Syedna successor case on April 29:
http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report-b ... 29-1976397

true_bohra
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:19 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#253

Unread post by true_bohra » Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:35 am

ghulam muhammed wrote:What actually happened in the London Hospital :
Actually Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin tried to say NURSE and poor Mufaddal bhaisaab heard it wrongly as NASS :mrgreen:

watsup msg.
Shame on you for circulating this. It really pains that you are mocking a person who lives in hearts of many. Where are the people who busy defending KQ and now when someone is mocking Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA, they have moved away...

monginis
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:00 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#254

Unread post by monginis » Wed Apr 09, 2014 2:57 am

true_bohra wrote:
ghulam muhammed wrote:What actually happened in the London Hospital :
Actually Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin tried to say NURSE and poor Mufaddal bhaisaab heard it wrongly as NASS :mrgreen:

watsup msg.
Shame on you for circulating this. It really pains that you are mocking a person who lives in hearts of many. Where are the people who busy defending KQ and now when someone is mocking Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA, they have moved away...
how is SMB mocked in this message? joke is on MS and his stupidity and his followers who really think any NASS is done on MS.

humanbeing
Posts: 2195
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:30 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#255

Unread post by humanbeing » Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:22 am

true_bohra wrote: Shame on you for circulating this. It really pains that you are mocking a person who lives in hearts of many. Where are the people who busy defending KQ and now when someone is mocking Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA, they have moved away...
The mockery of SMB’s condition and people faith was at display by kothar Inc, how he was paraded and even after SMB’s sad demise, how they turned the event into a carnival !

maddy
Posts: 73
Joined: Sat Nov 23, 2013 9:12 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#256

Unread post by maddy » Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:39 am

Rcvd Via Whats app
:D :D
Attachments
AUD-20140408-WA0119.mp3
(152.93 KiB) Downloaded 3222 times

Fatema MN
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 1:26 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#257

Unread post by Fatema MN » Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:55 am

maddy wrote:Rcvd Via Whats app
:D :D
Dear mumineen bhaiyo ane behno, this is a classic example of how the truth is twisted and misrepresented to the gullible people who believe every word that is uttered by the kothar and their amils!

The judge recused himself..... is translated to
The judge refused the case!!!

recused = to withdraw from a position of judging so as to avoid any semblance of partiality or bias.
refuse = decline.

monginis
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:00 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#258

Unread post by monginis » Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:19 am

case is not dismissed it is just postponed till 29th April, but these April fools thought case is rejected.

Akhtiar Wahid
Posts: 804
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:22 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#259

Unread post by Akhtiar Wahid » Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:21 am

these kothari goons and bottom hard sucked die hard bohras are making all these rhyming and melodious Slogans for Muffadal saab. Don't they realize they look like stupid fools, what will they get out of all this naarey baazi!

way2go
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:30 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#260

Unread post by way2go » Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:23 am

Fatema MN wrote:
maddy wrote:Rcvd Via Whats app
:D :D
Dear mumineen bhaiyo ane behno, this is a classic example of how the truth is twisted and misrepresented to the gullible people who believe every word that is uttered by the kothar and their amils!

The judge recused himself..... is translated to
The judge refused the case!!!

recused = to withdraw from a position of judging so as to avoid any semblance of partiality or bias.
refuse = decline.
Fatemaben.... Not just gullible but really stupid since they don't know the difference between recuse and refuse. But then, what can one expect from ones who follows a person who does not even know what 'fuwarra' means in english!!!!!

murtaza2152
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#261

Unread post by murtaza2152 » Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:58 am

Why u all jump to conclusion ?
This audio is recorded by any Tom Dick Harry not by Al Vazarat , its not official audio , have some brain in your head and then react to situation.

All world knows the difference of Recuse and Refuse.
So be patient , haq will prevail.

monginis
Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2014 8:00 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#262

Unread post by monginis » Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:13 am

way2go wrote:
Fatema MN wrote: Dear mumineen bhaiyo ane behno, this is a classic example of how the truth is twisted and misrepresented to the gullible people who believe every word that is uttered by the kothar and their amils!

The judge recused himself..... is translated to
The judge refused the case!!!

recused = to withdraw from a position of judging so as to avoid any semblance of partiality or bias.
refuse = decline.
Fatemaben.... Not just gullible but really stupid since they don't know the difference between recuse and refuse. But then, what can one expect from ones who follows a person who does not even know what 'fuwarra' means in english!!!!!
For me lack of English fluency is not a flaw in itself, after all, being a Muslim leader, fluency in Arabic, which matters, but lack of sensitivity in Islamic leader is unforgivable.

humanbeing
Posts: 2195
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:30 am

Re: The Indian Courts Observations On The Dai's Conduct.

#263

Unread post by humanbeing » Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:09 am

Interesting Read

humanbeing
Posts: 2195
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:30 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#264

Unread post by humanbeing » Wed Apr 09, 2014 8:19 am

Interesting !
adna-mumin wrote:Hoon adna mumin, Maula Mufaddal ne 53 dai manoo choo. Maula ni 100 mi Milad Mubarak par official endorse thayeli aa kitaab Mudar Bhayi Patherya lakhi ne Dawoodi Bohra Mailing List par baddha ne mokli hati. Mojizaa no 53 padhi ne confuse thayi gayo !!

Moula's Mojeza- ( 53 )
Following interview of Mohammedbhai Calcuttawala, Calcutta, by Mudar Patherya

It was March 2004 and one morning I dreamt that I was in the hazrat of Aqa Maula waiting for qadambosi. When my turn came and I submitted my hand, I was surprised to find that instead of accepting my obeisance, he said: “Tari qadambosi ni niyat chey to tu Syedi Mazoon Saheb (then in Kolkata for Ashara Mubaraka) ni qadambosi kar.” This was amazing: it had been more than three weeks and I had hardly gone in the hazrat of Syedi Mazoon Saheb. Immediately, I went hurriedly to Syedi Mazoon Saheb aney aap maro salaam qabul keedho!

Copy ends

http://hikmaah.com/download%5CA_CENTURY ... ATNESS.pdf
http://www.docin.com/p-438609269.html

Mazakyo
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 5:01 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#265

Unread post by Mazakyo » Wed Apr 09, 2014 9:10 am

murtaza2152 wrote:Why u all jump to conclusion ?
This audio is recorded by any Tom Dick Harry not by Al Vazarat , its not official audio , have some brain in your head and then react to situation.

All world knows the difference of Recuse and Refuse.
So be patient , haq will prevail.
Money will prevail mere dost !!

voice
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:08 pm

Re: The Indian Courts Observations On The Dai's Conduct.

#266

Unread post by voice » Wed Apr 09, 2014 3:11 pm

Great effort to bring these eye opener, valuable observations. Every Bohra must go through these. Thanks GM bhai.

Maqbool
Posts: 849
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 4:01 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#267

Unread post by Maqbool » Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:57 am

murtaza2152 wrote:Why u all jump to conclusion ?
This audio is recorded by any Tom Dick Harry not by Al Vazarat , its not official audio , have some brain in your head and then react to situation.

All world knows the difference of Recuse and Refuse.
So be patient , haq will prevail.
You are really Gulam. Have you ever seen at the time of fooling the gullible vazarat has sent official messages. After so much has come in to open and you ask such a silly things.

silvertongue
Posts: 578
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:34 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#268

Unread post by silvertongue » Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:40 am

No matter who wins the case. Mufaddalis will follow MS whatsoever while a few who might think out of the box will join SKQ but they will be less in numbers. If MS wins (which can be possible by altering proofs) he will totally excommunicate SKQ and his followers and continue his money collection schemes. if SKQ wins, the Dawat properties will be under his rule. What will MS followers gona do that time will only tell.

humanbeing
Posts: 2195
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 2:30 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#269

Unread post by humanbeing » Thu Apr 10, 2014 7:49 am

Whoever wins or looses, they will create their own set of properties ! bohras on both sides will continue to be fleeced ! while the one on the fence will enjoy the show and avail the services !

true_bohra
Posts: 719
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:19 am

Re: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Co

#270

Unread post by true_bohra » Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:42 am

silvertongue wrote:No matter who wins the case. Mufaddalis will follow MS whatsoever while a few who might think out of the box will join SKQ but they will be less in numbers. If MS wins (which can be possible by altering proofs) he will totally excommunicate SKQ and his followers and continue his money collection schemes. if SKQ wins, the Dawat properties will be under his rule. What will MS followers gona do that time will only tell.
Is it a compulsary condition that whatever prrofs given by Syedna TUS are altered and fake and the proof given by kq is real and true.