dal-chaval-palidu wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 11:24 pmUnhappyBohra wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 6:19 pm
STF was asked in court whether he believed the letter and he said that he did not. One of the reasons he gave, and I can’t remember exactly which one it was, but he pointed out either that the signature has an extra Alif or a missing Alif compared to how Miyasaab Yamani signed his madehs and his letters.
The fraud related to the nass audio, the letter signature related fraud, these are the reasons that this court case is important. It is about
the community - and that is why it is more than just a fight over properties.
And when did this particular Miyasaab Yamani pass away? Was it a while back?
Because another Miyasaab Yamani passed away a few years back. Was he the son, or, was it his signature on this nass letter?
It is cute to see you play the devil's advocate every now and then but don't be a gullible cat.
On the Nass diary entry,the tawqee mubarak is of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA himself.
And I notice you have been completely ignored by ajamali when you questioned him about his wild fanciful claims of 100th milad waaz.
As for you feigning concern for the community,I suggest you to not lose sleep over it. 99% of the community have pledged their allegiance to the 53rd Dai Syedna Aaliqadr Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS.
The court case is all about the Dawat properties. And I ask you (byculla couldn't come up with an answer on this) how is it Adl that as a schism of 500-600 people are looking to usurp the properties catering to lacs and lacs of people? Such is the greed of the Qutbis.
PS: If you are planning to reply to this post and not sidestep it as you have done in the past,I look forward to you not getting hung up on the 500-600 numbers. Even if you multiply it by 10,5000-6000 still equates to 1% of the community.