There's no comparison.objectiveobserver53 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 2:16 pmAfter calling us YouTube dawat, they are resorting to it themselves! Did someone not say imitation is the highest form of flattery?Crater Lake wrote: ↑Mon Mar 30, 2020 9:52 am Is it just me, or are the Mufaddalies looking more and more like those with STF......socially isolated, internet amal instructions, praying at home, YouTube majlises....it’s lovely to see
The Majlises are being streamed *privately*, using login credentials. This is how relays of waaz have been done since Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin s time. This is nothing new.
Keyword: Private, not Public.
Whereas TB and the Qutbi Bohras continue to operate a YouTube Dawat, on a platform which is publicly accessible.
Keyword: Public, not private.
Proggies and others sects on this platform are free to debate whether it should be private or public.
However, anyone with an iota of understanding of *true* "Fatemi" philosophy will know that esteemed Duat of the past, including Syedna Moiyed Al Shirazi and Syedna Qadi Noman have stressed that "Majalis Al Hikmah" should remain private, to a select audience and not public. This is why they were held within the Imams Palace.
Again, keywords: Private, not Public.
If anyone is imitating, then it Taher Fakhruddin that's imitating dissenters in the history of Fatemi history (eg: Ja'far) that chose to make public what was deemed to be private. They went against these Fatemi principles.
Taher Fakhruddin and his Qutbi Bohras are following their footsteps. حذو النعل بالنعل