Dawoodi Bohra Forum

Progticide is a moron. Whether it is "This" book or "That" book, they both refer to the Quran. Not an invisible Imam. Second, 1/2/3 and 4 have not invented literature that needs to be followed. They have always demanded obedience to the Quran and the Sunnah of the prophet (saw). The slap in the face of these morons is that, doesn't matter however much they hate it, they still have to display obedience to the Quran compiled by 1/2 and 3!!!

As a taunt Editor Al Ehraam had written with the name of Syedna Taher saifuddin "Sultan" first time. He did not understood the taunt where he also mentioned that he is not hold power even equal to grave land on the earth. His "Khushamdi Kuthaar" had started using this term from that day, which is continue till today.
Sultan Mufaddal is enjoying his life on the Haraam income of Dawoodi Bohras. He never give lesson to them to earn income only from Halal sources because he is sitting to Paak the Harrm income. From this Haraam income only Harami people can enjoy but this fund can not be use for good deeds and help of needy Mumineen.

anajmi wrote: Whether it is "This" book or "That" book, they both refer to the Quran.

Bringforth one ayah from the Holy Quran or one authentic Hadith that mentions that Holy Quran 2:2 (Chapter 2, Ayah 2) when specifying Zalekal Kitab is speaking about Holy Quran itself.

BTW, the call "as salaato khairun min annoum" was also created after the Prophet(SAWW). So, you are proved to be not having Taqwa on one more count as per your own rule of thumb.

Bringforth one ayah from the Holy Quran or one authentic Hadith that mentions that Holy Quran 2:2 (Chapter 2, Ayah 2) when specifying Zalekal Kitab is speaking about Holy Quran itself.

As I said, you are a moron. This is like me asking you to prove that your father is your father by asking your father!!

progticide wrote:

anajmi wrote: Whether it is "This" book or "That" book, they both refer to the Quran.

Bringforth one ayah from the Holy Quran or one authentic Hadith that mentions that Holy Quran 2:2 (Chapter 2, Ayah 2) when specifying Zalekal Kitab is speaking about Holy Quran itself.

BTW, the call "as salaato khairun min annoum" was also created after the Prophet(SAWW). So, you are proved to be not having Taqwa on one more count as per your own rule of thumb.

Bring forth one ayah from the Quran which talks about your fake Fatimid beliefs.

10:37

وَمَا كَانَ هَـذَا الْقُرْآنُ أَن يُفْتَرَى مِن دُونِ اللّهِ وَلَـكِن تَصْدِيقَ الَّذِي بَيْنَ يَدَيْهِ وَتَفْصِيلَ الْكِتَابِ لاَ رَيْبَ فِيهِ مِن رَّبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ

If you look at the above ayah, Allah says THIS Quran is an explanation of the book wherein there is no doubt.

17:9

إِنَّ هَـذَا الْقُرْآنَ يِهْدِي لِلَّتِي هِيَ أَقْوَمُ وَيُبَشِّرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ الَّذِينَ يَعْمَلُونَ الصَّالِحَاتِ أَنَّ لَهُمْ أَجْرًا كَبِيرًا

Here Allah says this Quran is a guide.

For those not blinded by their idols the Quran is absolutely clear. The rest have to stand in front of corrupt Dais with folded hands and have to call it their "belief"!!

BTW, the call "as salaato khairun min annoum" was also created after the Prophet(SAWW). So, you are proved to be not having Taqwa on one more count as per your own rule of thumb.

Do you know the meaning of "as salaato khairun min annoum"? Do you disagree with that statement? Not one single muslim on earth will say that this statement is unIslamic. Not even fools like you will say that the above statement is unIslamic. I dare you to say that "as salaato khairun min annoum" is unIslamic. However, I can say with confidence that "Fatimid" beliefs are unIslamic. A vast majority of muslims will say that "Fatimid" beliefs are unIslamic.

progticide wrote:

anajmi wrote: Whether it is "This" book or "That" book, they both refer to the Quran.

Bringforth one ayah from the Holy Quran or one authentic Hadith that mentions that Holy Quran 2:2 (Chapter 2, Ayah 2) when specifying Zalekal Kitab is speaking about Holy Quran itself.

Watch This
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGkLpjrr5rM