I want to thank you, Juzer bhai Esmail, for diligently putting all the articles here. It is very helpful, and I think I am speaking on behalf of many, when I say - Thank Youjuzer esmail wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:09 am https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/m ... 51043.html
Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
I also wanted to add here the October 19th order from the Mumbai High Court. It gives insights into a few of the Questions, and Inshallah when the full set is available, it will be an interesting read.
A couple of observations. In the para 38, I am curious to know when the digital archivist inserted, by mistake, as per his own admission, “kare chhe” or “nass kare chhe”. The relevant para are 37 and 38. Here is what the order mentions: "He explained that there was indeed an error and a portion had inadvertently got transposed or translocated."
Just curious to know what was changed, especially since the whole debate is about where the words "nass kare chhe" where said or not?
And if people want some humour, please read para 32.
A couple of observations. In the para 38, I am curious to know when the digital archivist inserted, by mistake, as per his own admission, “kare chhe” or “nass kare chhe”. The relevant para are 37 and 38. Here is what the order mentions: "He explained that there was indeed an error and a portion had inadvertently got transposed or translocated."
Just curious to know what was changed, especially since the whole debate is about where the words "nass kare chhe" where said or not?
And if people want some humour, please read para 32.
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:24 am
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Past instances prove that only final nass of succession is valid
so how can we be sure that the last nass was on muffy only and not on Qaid joher
so how can we be sure that the last nass was on muffy only and not on Qaid joher
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
I think the argument should have ended when two past Dai's did Nass on SKQ namely STS and SMB. Then at last instance SMB changed his mind and did Nass on his son SMS, doesn't sound right. There is more to it then what we see, there is some serious "Gochi" (dirty) going on.
All i have seen during present times, since SMS has came in power the complete Kothar has gone out of control and each individual now think he is Dai. They have complete control over SMS, now SMS has become more of a puppet.
All i have seen during present times, since SMS has came in power the complete Kothar has gone out of control and each individual now think he is Dai. They have complete control over SMS, now SMS has become more of a puppet.
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
true , it seems MS is having no say in kothar and it is run by team of "experts" who does marketing day in day out for money and keep inventing new schemes every day, I get around 5 to 6 emails daily with different schemes and instructions to follow lol
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:16 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Yes many thanks may allah increase your reward!dal-chaval-palidu wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 2:37 pmI want to thank you, Juzer bhai Esmail, for diligently putting all the articles here. It is very helpful, and I think I am speaking on behalf of many, when I say - Thank Youjuzer esmail wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 12:09 am https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/m ... 51043.html
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:24 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
OMG if SMS wins the kothar will become an Azaab on poor mumineens, Then the torture and goonda-gardi will start on full throttle, it will be another pheronic rule May Allah SWT protect the poor souls... Ameen
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 1:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
In the old days dawat was ruled by three rutba Dai-Mazoon-Mukasir and later on it was updated as Dai and below are Mazoon and Mukasir. In both scenarios where do all shezadas fit in?
Nowadays even Mazoon and Mukasir are afraid of shezadas. Badri mahal used to be run by Mazoon/Mukasir but now everything is shezada. Most of the times Mazoon and Mukasir are clue less about Dais program too.
What happened to “Imam ye teen rutba kaiem kida che”?
To avoid all these mess, nass must be done in the present of hierarchy. The witnesses of nass should be Mazoon or Mukasir not shezadas.
Nowadays even Mazoon and Mukasir are afraid of shezadas. Badri mahal used to be run by Mazoon/Mukasir but now everything is shezada. Most of the times Mazoon and Mukasir are clue less about Dais program too.
What happened to “Imam ye teen rutba kaiem kida che”?
To avoid all these mess, nass must be done in the present of hierarchy. The witnesses of nass should be Mazoon or Mukasir not shezadas.
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Just go and Join Taher especially if you are not in INDIAallbird wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 6:31 am OMG if SMS wins the kothar will become an Azaab on poor mumineens, Then the torture and goonda-gardi will start on full throttle, it will be another pheronic rule May Allah SWT protect the poor souls... Ameen
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Good advice from frying pan into the fire....no thank you...Social Awareness wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:42 amJust go and Join Taher especially if you are not in INDIAallbird wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 6:31 am OMG if SMS wins the kothar will become an Azaab on poor mumineens, Then the torture and goonda-gardi will start on full throttle, it will be another pheronic rule May Allah SWT protect the poor souls... Ameen


i am almost out. Which side are you on ?
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Uhmmm makes sense, yes you are right in many way. For such a high position the witness should match that calibre. These shezadas were trained and natured by YN thus the result EVILQutbiBohra wrote: Tue Apr 04, 2023 10:06 pm In the old days dawat was ruled by three rutba Dai-Mazoon-Mukasir and later on it was updated as Dai and below are Mazoon and Mukasir. In both scenarios where do all shezadas fit in?
Nowadays even Mazoon and Mukasir are afraid of shezadas. Badri mahal used to be run by Mazoon/Mukasir but now everything is shezada. Most of the times Mazoon and Mukasir are clue less about Dais program too.
What happened to “Imam ye teen rutba kaiem kida che”?
To avoid all these mess, nass must be done in the present of hierarchy. The witnesses of nass should be Mazoon or Mukasir not shezadas.

YN got the foot in the door by getting his daughter married to SMS just like Omar got Aisha married to Rasullah SAW. That Jaali nass in 1965 was the brain child of YN so that his daughter's future is secured. SMB was not scared of SKQ but the villain behind the scene YN and his own children 9 in total and the eldest one Mariam was the main Fasaad ki Jar a complete control freak.
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:24 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
The arguments concludes
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:24 am
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:16 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Thanks again for the wonderful coverage throughout the case. Even if Muffy wins there is a long list of their fallacies and human tendencies amply documented in this thread and this forum for any inquisitive future reader that might be interested. For the ones who are not, pheronic rule is your haqq.juzer esmail wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 10:51 pm https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/m ... 35011.html
I wish this forum was there in the chandabhai gulla case as well, this might just be one of the most well documented of daawat succession disputes thanks to people like you.
All the others are conveniently locked up in jamea and kothar vaults at the discretion of the clown dais.
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Does anyone knowledgeable in the Indian court system have an idea of what additional timeframe before the judgement is declared? Is it like 15 days or a month, or 3 month, or ... ???
Any intelligent guess?
Any intelligent guess?
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
this is the first dispute that happened in the internet age with lots of audio/video and other technologies.
I mean, consider the dispute after the 46th dai passed away. A few folks in some house in Surat said so-and-so, or decided something, and that is all we had to go by. Now there are medical records, and audio and video and lots of these documents that they submitted, and the arguments that both sides presented - the consistency, or lack there off, will be at least scrutinized.
I have a feeling, but I could be wrong (have been wrong before many times in the past) that this issue may make the impact of this case somewhat different - inshallah, we shall see.
I mean, consider the dispute after the 46th dai passed away. A few folks in some house in Surat said so-and-so, or decided something, and that is all we had to go by. Now there are medical records, and audio and video and lots of these documents that they submitted, and the arguments that both sides presented - the consistency, or lack there off, will be at least scrutinized.
I have a feeling, but I could be wrong (have been wrong before many times in the past) that this issue may make the impact of this case somewhat different - inshallah, we shall see.
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
I also find the para 75 in this document quiet informative. In that the witness (Kinaa bhaisaheb, I believe) said that the "Dai has made errors in oral communications, and in their writings. He recalled an error by the 52nd Dai himself."dal-chaval-palidu wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2023 2:52 pm I also wanted to add here the October 19th order from the Mumbai High Court. It gives insights into a few of the Questions, and Inshallah when the full set is available, it will be an interesting read.
A couple of observations. In the para 38, I am curious to know when the digital archivist inserted, by mistake, as per his own admission, “kare chhe” or “nass kare chhe”. The relevant para are 37 and 38. Here is what the order mentions: "He explained that there was indeed an error and a portion had inadvertently got transposed or translocated."
Just curious to know what was changed, especially since the whole debate is about where the words "nass kare chhe" where said or not?
And if people want some humour, please read para 32. Mumbai_High_cour_order_17-19oct2022.pdf
I find it interesting that SMS' witness is saying that the 52nd Dai made a mistake. Wonder what was the purpose of the same? If we accept that the Dai made a mistake, who is to say he cannot make a mistake in something else, like doing a nass ?
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
I am on Allah side reading Quran and praying salah on time and doing fastallbird wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:30 amGood advice from frying pan into the fire....no thank you...Social Awareness wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:42 am
Just go and Join Taher especially if you are not in INDIA![]()
. Bohraism is not a religion but a Hindu convert CULT. Closer to Hinduism and far away from main stream Islam and we are proud of it (reference watch Youtube video) , we do Dai-puja and Aarti puja of Dai. We hang Dai pictures in our homes close to doors so we do Darshan before going to work, we do Charan-sparsh of Dai for blessing. Tell me if i am wrong open for debate / Mubahela.
i am almost out. Which side are you on ?
as far as culture is concerned I am yet to find better than Bohras in sense of living standards so till then I am continuing with it keeping really law profile and keeping distance
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
good to know finally case has been concluded lets see what results come up
I hope Muffy gets a big blow and his charbi comes down
I hope Muffy gets a big blow and his charbi comes down
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:46 am
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Does anybody have a reference to an HT article which says when SMB got the stroke (was it May 31st or June 1st, if I remember one of the articles?)
And also when he was admitted to the hospital ? Was is June 3rd?
Reference to the articles would be good. Thanks.
I am trying to understand if there was a gap between these two instances (the time when he got the stroke, and when he was admitted to the hospital)?
And also when he was admitted to the hospital ? Was is June 3rd?
Reference to the articles would be good. Thanks.
I am trying to understand if there was a gap between these two instances (the time when he got the stroke, and when he was admitted to the hospital)?
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
The good exercise out of this court case we all derived is the inside knowledge and the corruption was exposed wide open. It just encourages all of us that if mazoon of 50 years can walk out, we all CAN its doable. We create our own Jannat and Jahanam none of this cheap chor Dai's are going to take us there, they are here to fill their coffers and live high life.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2023 2:25 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
It will be interesting to see what the court rules on the key points:
What are the stipulations for a Nass in accordance with the faith?
Has the Plaintiff (SKQ, STF) provided sufficient evidence that a Nass was granted to him?
Is it possible to retract, revoke, modify, or replace a conferred Nass in accordance with the faith?
Has the Defendant (SMS) provided sufficient evidence that a Nass was granted to him?
What are the stipulations for a Nass in accordance with the faith?
Has the Plaintiff (SKQ, STF) provided sufficient evidence that a Nass was granted to him?
Is it possible to retract, revoke, modify, or replace a conferred Nass in accordance with the faith?
Has the Defendant (SMS) provided sufficient evidence that a Nass was granted to him?
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
who ever lied ( and we know who actually lied) has no fear of ALLAH
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Jus t quick question to my learned friends, If tarrahweeh is innovation and added shrikh by the Khalifah of the time and most of the mullana's confirmed Rasullaha SAW never prayed tarrahweeh. Then can anyone confirm did Rasullaha SAW prayed Washeeq's as per our doctorine ? Someone asked me but didn't have a reply for this question.
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Wasshaiq and all other such special prayers are added by either Imam or awliyah of previous times that's why these prayers are not faraijallbird wrote: Sat Apr 08, 2023 9:04 am Jus t quick question to my learned friends, If tarrahweeh is innovation and added shrikh by the Khalifah of the time and most of the mullana's confirmed Rasullaha SAW never prayed tarrahweeh. Then can anyone confirm did Rasullaha SAW prayed Washeeq's as per our doctorine ? Someone asked me but didn't have a reply for this question.
this is added to pray more on especial nights as a mark of respect and to keep people busy praying
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Thanks for the reply, but it only answers my question partially. From your response if Imams, Dua's and Awlyah added these non-faraij namaz for more Sawab then tawarraweh is NOT Shrik, Right !Social Awareness wrote: Sat Apr 08, 2023 9:53 amWasshaiq and all other such special prayers are added by either Imam or awliyah of previous times that's why these prayers are not faraijallbird wrote: Sat Apr 08, 2023 9:04 am Jus t quick question to my learned friends, If tarrahweeh is innovation and added shrikh by the Khalifah of the time and most of the mullana's confirmed Rasullaha SAW never prayed tarrahweeh. Then can anyone confirm did Rasullaha SAW prayed Washeeq's as per our doctorine ? Someone asked me but didn't have a reply for this question.
this is added to pray more on especial nights as a mark of respect and to keep people busy praying
So if washeq is not shirk then tawaarraweh is not shirk too ?
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:41 pm
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
how can praying to Allah can ever be shirk? who told you this?
SHIRK MEANS MAKING ASSOCIATES/PARTNERS TO ALLAH, WHAT DO SUNNIS RECITE IN TARAWIH WHICH MAKES ASSOCIATES TO ALLAH?
SHIRK MEANS MAKING ASSOCIATES/PARTNERS TO ALLAH, WHAT DO SUNNIS RECITE IN TARAWIH WHICH MAKES ASSOCIATES TO ALLAH?
Re: Sticky: Dawoodi Bohra's Succession of Dai Case in Mumbai High Court
Simple answer my little friend, Tarraweh are prayed in Jamma'h while washeq's are prayed individual. More diluted for you... Tarraweeh are prayed like Farz namaz while Washeq's are sunnat namaz.