Kaka Akela said: 5-10-2005 - 5.07 p.m.
"So I welcome you to our religion, make sure you really want it after reading about it. it will be worthwhile to buy the book" Mullahs on the mainframe" which gives a balanced view of the community with chapters on faith, beliefs, etc, and also chapters on the anti-Dai elements which is represented here on this forum."
We take exception to your finding about the book giving "a balanced view".
Please refer to the following posts re. the biased and subjective view of Jonah Blank on this website.
*********************************************
Mumineen:
posted 07-23-2002 09:50 PM
________________________________________
I wrote to Jonah Blank a few years ago after he wrote an article in an American Magazine (US and the World!!)about the Bohras.
Apparently he had secured his Ph.d doing a thesis on the Bohras. He had gone to Bombay where the Kothar had aided and fetted him (at Saifee Mahal, I suppose)to write the very subjective thesis after being fed with all the slanted and self-serving stuff about the Bohras. He reckoned in his article that the Bohras were the most modern sect in Islam. (what?? - with all those fundamental practices of Saayo, Topi, Dadhi and Rida, extortions, misappropriation and appropriation of Community trust funds and
properties, FGM, shunning,poor josh maatam etc.etc.etc)
When I asked him about the Bohras following that barbaric and illegal Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)practice, he responded that he had discussed the practice with HH and HH denied that the practice existed in the Community.
I responded that HH was using another practice called "Taquiyah" ato conceal the truth, Mr. Blank was not sure !!
I think he also indicated that he had either met or heard of Dr. Asghar Ali Engineer and was aware of this Progressive Website when I challenged him about his objectivity being adulterated by the Kothar.
Now that Mr. Blank is working in Washington for the US Govt (US State Dept - Foreign Affairs Committee!!), I am sure the Kothar is and will exploit him fully to have an access to the US Government officials and politicians.
Isn't what they are doing in India now? Invitations to visit the Saifee Mahal to the corrupt the RSS and BJP fascists during Idd and Milaad of HH - in addition to spending the ill-gotten gains to bribe these officials and politicians.
________________________________________
Posts: 306
posted 08-02-2002 04:09 PM
________________________________________
Here's the correspondence I referred to in my post of July 23, 2002:
*******************************************
Thanks for your message, and for the interesting information. As you rightly note, taqiya is a longstanding practice for Bohras (as for all Shia groups), and it is one of the main reasons that as an outsider I can make no claim to having authoritative truth.
I have not been able to verify the existence of a dawat ban on FGM:
some dawat sources have told me the practice is banned, but others have said it is not. All of my sources agree that any extreme form of genital cutting is forbidden, by hadith rather than (or in addition to) direct pronouncement of Syedna. Those who say the practice is not banned say the only permissible form is a symbolic nick rather than actual excision.
Of all the difficult issues an anthropologist has to face during
fieldwork, genital cutting is one of the most difficult. As a male
researcher, I am even less qualified to make any authoritative judgement: all the information I receive is second, third, and fourth hand. All I can do is repeat what others have told me, both reformist and dawat sources alike.
All best wishes,
Jonah Blank
At 12:53 AM 8/3/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Dear Mr. Blank:
>
>Thanks a lot for your offer. I hope you are successful in your endeavours.
>
>I do not wish to be skeptical or cynical but even if you are successful it will make most of the Bohras skeptical and cynical as well because of the following fact.
>
>There is a Bohra/Shia concept called "Tequiyah" which according to my
>limited knowledge of theology is a principle which allows a leader or
>his disciple to lie, perjure, cheat, steal, exaggerate or hide when in
>his opinion his faith is threatened by a non-believer of the faith -
>e.g. a Kaafir or Muddai (Reformist)
>
>So to save themselves from a public relations crisis or disaster or
>humiliations by journalists or women's organizations, the Dawat or His
>Holiness may give you this document in fact but may direct the flock
>otherwise through their world-wide network of Amils. In the parlance of an African adage: "an elephant has two sets of teeth. One set to chew and the other set (the tusks) to show off!!
>
>This is personal experience. For example, a few years ago at the Nasser Mosque in Cairo, Egypt, His Holiness and some of us Bohras
>prayed under an Egyptian Imam from Al Azhar. His Holiness instructed us to pray under the Imam under Tequiyah. but when we go back to our
>Hotels, to make up or "re-pray" as presumably the prayers under the
>non-bohri Imam were not :Jaeez" or valid.
>
>Another example, during prayer times at Haj time in Mecca, Bohras are
>directed from NOT praying under a non-Bohra Imam, at either the
>Prophet's Mosque or in the KAABA but instead offer their prayers at the
>Bohra Musafirkhana either under the Bohra Imam or by themselves.
>Poor Bohras, they come all the way from their home countries to Mecca
>and they are not allowed to offer their prayers in the holiest Islamic
>Shrines.
>
>Because the Bohras follow the Misri Lunar Calendar, they invariably
>perform their Haj a day earlier. This means they can't and don't
>complete one of the the mandatory rituals of a valid HAJ "Safa/Marwa" by themselves or in full view of other non-bohra millions of Muslims. The argument the priest give the gullible Bohras is that as soon as they view the KAABA with their naked eyes, their HAJ is complete. The priests also say that if they see His Holiness in person, this is equivalent to performing HAJ.
>
>In the meantime I await the documentation of the ban by His Holiness of the Female Genital Mutilation. This will be a very noble and heartfelt service by you to the thousands of oppressed and frightened Bohri young girls who have yet to go through this inhuman, barbaric and criminal torture.
>
>Thanks
>
>>
>>From: Jonah Blank
>>Subject: Re: Your Article on the Muslim Mainstream et al in July 20
>> News & World Report
>>
>> >> Thank you for your message. I'll ask a dawat source if he has documentation for the ban.
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Jonah Blank
>>
>>
>>At 11:15 AM 7/31/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>>Dear Mr. Jonah Blank:
>>>
>>>Thanks for your prompt response including the clarifications etc.
>>>
>>>The only hard evidence of female genital mutilation is my personal
>>>knowledge of the immediate family members - i.e. nieces, daughters of cousins and friends having been through this barbaric tradition. As
>the practice is illegal in our country, some of the little girls were
>taken to UK to get this done atleast seven years ago under a close
>supervision or sponsorship of a "Dr Ganiwalla" of UK. A few years ago a lady-doctor belonging to the Royal family also visited Canada from California to perform these illegal acts "on mass". The best evidence will be for the family doctors of the young bohra girls to compel them to report of these unlawful acts (having already been committed) to the proper authorities. I suppose this requires statutory legislation through the aegis of the UN or UNESCO or some worldwide women or children's organization.
>>>
>>>If the dawat has banned this practice, then it is news to me. If you
>do have this in some form of evidentiary documents, I shall be pleased to obtain this from you please. Perhaps you could also endeavour to use
>>>your journalistic influence to ask the dawate hadiya - including His
>>>Holiness himself, to proclaim a verbal as well as documentary
>directive to their worldwide community of this change of cruel policy or the denial of the fatwa in the first place.
>>>
>>>Thanks again and have a very good week end.
>>>
>>>>From
jblank@usnews.com Thu Jul 30 17:16:45 1998
>>>>
>>>>From: Jonah Blank
>>>>Subject: Re: Your Article on the Muslim Mainstream et al in July 20
>>>> News & World Report
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thank you for your message, and link to the Webpage. I have
>>>interviewed a number of reformist Bohras, both in this country and in India, and if I have occasion to write longer pieces on the community I hope to include discussion of the disagreement between the dawat and its opponents. I have read all of the major works of Asghar Ali Engineer, and have spoken with him at length.
Do you have any evidence for the charge of female genital mutilation?
>I have heard rumors of it, but only from individuals (such as Dr. Engineer) who are open adversaries of the dawat. The practice is officially banned by the dawat, and has been for some time. If you have hard evidence that such a ban is not being enforced I would be interested to see it.
>>>>
>>>>On the issue of "matriarchy," I should point out that the full quote was significantly more nuanced prior to editing: my original segment was several paragraphs long, and the editors chopped it down to a single sentence.
>>>I was not pleased with the cut-- nor were members of the orthodox Bohra community. The point was not to argue that Bohra women are more powerful than Bohra men, but to note that Bohra women (both orthodox and reformist alike) tend to have higher educational levels and higher social standing than the women of many other Muslim communities. That, I think, is something in which Bohras of all camps can take pride.
>>>>
>>>>All best wishes,
>>>>
>>>>Jonah Blank
>>>>
>>>>At 05:47 PM 7/30/98 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>>Please refer to the following Webpage for your education on the
>>>>>oppression of the minority Bohra reformists by the majority
>>>>>fundamentalist Dawoodi Bohra Community. You may be tempted to write a more objective article on the Dawoodi Bohras after studying all the contents of the webpage.
>>>>>
>>>>>By the way, speaking of the "matriachy" in the community, did you
>know that the Dawoodi Bohra Community (fundamentalists)is the only Asian Muslim Community to enforce and practice female genital mutilation?
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://www.dawoodi-bohras.com
>>>>>
________________________________________
Posts: 306
saif wrote
Regular
Member # 344 posted 08-02-2002 04:20 PM
________________________________________
Here's the correspondence between Sheikh Dr.Mustafa Abdulhussein, (the Kothari from UK) and Mr Jonah Blank. I leave it to the readers to determine the objectivity of Mr. Blank when he writes:
"......As an anthropologist who has been fortunate enough to have lived among and learned from the Daudi Bohras in India and Pakistan for four years-- with the generous raza and duwa of His Holiness Syedna
Muhammad Burhanuddin (TUS)-- it has always been, and will always be, my hope and intention to repay the community's kindness with kindness in return......"
============================================
Re:
Subject:
Re: posting to internet
Date:
Mon, 20 Jul 1998 18:19:50 -0400
From:
Jonah Blank
To:
Mustafa Abdulhussein
Dear members of the Daudi Bohra Internet community:
Shaikh Dr. Mustafa Abdulhussein has asked me to provide some context for an article of mine that has caused some recent internet discussion
("The Muslim Mainstream" in US News & World Report, July 20, 1998). I am very happy to do so, since in my journalistic and academic work I always strive to be sensitive to the concerns of Muslims in general and Bohras in particular.
As an anthropologist who has been fortunate enough to have lived among and learned from the Daudi Bohras in India and Pakistan for four years-- with the generous raza and duwa of His Holiness Syedna Muhammad Burhanuddin (TUS)-- it has always been, and will always be, my hope and intention to repay the community's kindness with kindness in return.
The purpose of my article "The Muslim Mainstream" was to correct some of the negative stereotypes about Muslims so commonly perpetuated by the American media. In so doing, I also hoped to inform a wider audience about the successes of the Daudi Bohras in many areas: in the original text, gender relations made up only one of many topics discussed: the article had been slated for a cover story, and as originally written it showcased the amazing triumphs of the Bohras in such areas as education and modernization; it highlighted both deen and dunya-- showed how, under Syedna's guidance,Bohras have simultaneously reinvigorated traditional practices while moving ahead in the modern world.
In the editing process, the story was cut from 8 pages to 4, most Bohra material was cut out, and the context and nuance of Shamim Dahod's quote fell by the wayside. While I fought the editors hard and tried to retain as much Bohra material as possible, I (rather than Shamim-behn) bear full responsibility for the text. In fact, the Dahod family asked to revise the quote in question, and I would have been quite happy to oblige, but the correction arrived only after the article had gone to type.
Internet postings that have been relayed to me make several excellent points: that dual-career families are not the only
standard for gender equality, and that "matriarchy" might not be the best choice of word to describe the very real equality of the Bohra community. The Dahods'comments to me were entirely in accord with the posted critiques-- and with dawat orthodoxy. Any mischaracterization is my fault (and the fault of my editors) rather than that of the Dahods.
I worked as hard as possible to get a positive, upbeat,stereotype-correcting article on Muslims published by a mainstream American newsmagazine-- as far as I can tell, the first such piece ever by one of the
Big Three newsmagazines (Newsweek once had a smaller piece on Islam
In America, not overly positive, to follow up some heavily anti-Muslim coverage; Time doesn't seem to have done anything unrelated to Mid-East
violence). I am very grateful to everyone who helped make this possible. I am very grateful, also, for the outpouring of support after the article,from Muslims of all denominations. I sincerely apologize for the article's shortcomings-- and when I saw the edited version, I too had a few
bones to pick. But on the whole, I am glad to have been able to show American readers a face of Islam far more positive than what they generally have been shown
by current stereotype. Anyone who wishes to contact me directly can
do so
at:
jblank@usnews.com.
With respect, and all best wishes,
Jonah Blank
________________________________________
Posts: 55