This is my first post. I have been reading this forum actively since the past few months – I wonder how much the traffic/readership jumped on this forum after Jan 17th? I am using this forum to ask some questions that I have. Shz. Malik-ul-Ashtar said in his speech that if we have questions, we can ask them – I would appreciate it if we can get answers to the questions below.
The Nass of June 2011 (eve of 4th Rajab) initially said there were 4 (or 5 counting Husaina bensaheba) witnesses. See the link below. Okay.
http://akhbar.mumineen.org/2011/06/05/b ... uddin-tus/
http://akhbar.mumineen.org/2011/06/05/b ... uddin-tus/
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =433193903 --- older one
Then of course the Rajab 19th in Radatut Tahera.
Those were the only 2 events mentioned until Moula’s wafat on Jan 17th, 2014. Nothing else related to the nass was mentioned. Those were the only two events.
After that (after 1/17/2014) the Mazoon saheb Khozema bhai-saheb disclosed the nass on him.
...... A few days later the claim was made that a nass was done on Mufaddal moula 47 years back – see the several links below. It said that the nass was reaffirmed on several occasions.
Question: Why no mention of it until after maula’s death, and no mention of it in the intervening period (from June 2011 up to Jan 1th 2014)? Can Mufaddal Maula’s side explain this? And if the nass was done 47 years back and reaffirmed several times, why this critical need to have this London Nass declaration a few hours after moula’s stroke? And why no mention of it until after the counter claim?
http://www.dnaindia.com/pune/report-boh ... on-1957086
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city ... 484841.cms
http://www.mumbaimirror.com/mumbai/othe ... 622505.cms
Then Abdul Qader bhaisaheb says the witnesses to the London Hospital nass were 6 people.
Question: How did 4 (or 5) people initially (see above) become 6 people? Now Moula has a stroke, and he starts speaking, and they are talking and chatting and serving sherbet but not calling the doctor that Moula has regained speech? For somebody who had a stroke, that he is speaking is definitely neurologically significant medical information. We forgot about the doctors at all? And since it was in ICU, were there any doctor’s notes/other records/videos, anybody else (nurses) present? These are some questions (to say the least) about this version of events.
So an explanation of the above questions would help. Why no recoding of the London nass. No medical record. No hospital records/video of the same? Can they release it publicly?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mufaddal_Saifuddin --- newer one
Then sometime later, Shezada Malek-ul-Ashter (in his speech in the Masjid during the Sipara Majlis) says that 3 to 4 years back moula was not well, was not sure about what the doctors were saying, and he did Nass in the presence of him and Shezada Quaid Zohar BS.
Question: And how come both these Shezada’s never mentioned anything between June 2011 and Jan 17th, 2014? Why after the alternate claim is put forth do you have this changing story? And if this nass was done, why was the London nass so critical? After all, you are saying Burhanuddin Moula did nass in London Hospital in front of 4 or other 6 people; and previously in front of two people? Why was that any less valid, so why no mention of it until post the counter claim being made. Also, do the shezada’s have any idea why Maula just did not declare it out aloud? His sons were with him, and he was the undisputed leader, so why not just make it public – and we would not have been where we are now J
Then Mufaddal Moula says in the Waiz on Feb 4th, 2014 that Burhanuddin Moula had told him about the nass and showed him the paper some 4-5 years back. Mufaddal Moula does not remember the exact date, which is somewhat surprising. [People typically remember seminal events of their life. I remember even now where I was when Indira Gandhi was assassinated, and that is 30 years back.]
And so if he knew of this 4-5 years back, and several times before that too, why did the initial reports after the London nass say that Mufaddal Moula was totally surprised? Would he not have said: Oh, I know of it. You may be surprised, but I know of it. So why was he surprised? Question: An explanation of that would be helpful.Also, do the Shezada's know as to why Moula did not openly announce the nass on Muffaddal Maula say between 2000 to 2010?
I would appreciate sincere answers to the above questions. Thanks.