
http://youtu.be/MB9Y0Hiu6oI
I kinda like this new Moula of the Qutbis. Young and dynamic. Feeling optimistic for them.....and us.....!!!!
Most likely he is reading from a TelePrompTer. His eyes are fixed in one directionsubcon111 wrote:I think he is reading from a script. Regardless, the approach is different and refreshing.
UnhappyBohra wrote:Hee hee. I still remember the MS speech on the profound topic of Surat and Muniras.....I think it went something like this..."Surat maa ghani Munira che....Tamey sagla jaantaj haso koi Munira ne. Jano cho ne Munira ne mumineen. Mein bhi janu chu kai ek Munira ne je Surat maa rahey che...".....W-T-F..., and I mean WTF, not some personthink_for_yourself wrote:Cross posting a post I made under another topic
1,500,000,000 Muslims of Shia and Sunni agree on sujuds principles. I don't write history nor change ideology.mustafazr wrote:SBM wrote:Visual presentation is everything.
Haqq is not about numbers, nor is it about the historical majority. Sunnis believe Abu Bakr was the successor to Rasulullah, yet we are Shias and categorically reject it. Christians, which dwarf the worldwide Muslim population, believe Eesa Nabi to be son of God, yet we are Muslims, believe in Tawheed and categorically reject it. Time and again, history has shown that numbers is a poor indicator of where truth lies, and today, we are reliving that history in Dawat.Ozdundee wrote:1,500,000,000 Muslims of Shia and Sunni agree on sujuds principles. I don't write history nor change ideology.
There is no confusion. Sajda equates Ta'at (obedience). It does not equate worship. No Imam and no Dai has demanded mumineen worship him. But the Quran has declared that Ta'at is wajib, for Allah, Rasul and Ulil Amr, which in Ismaili Shia interpretation is the Imam, and in Satr, the Dai. How do you know that there is no sawab? The Quran states Allah ordered Firishta to give sajdo to Adam, did Allah do so knowing there was no gain for Firishta in this act? No purity in ibaadat to Allah is lost by this act of obedience to Waliullah, if that was the case, why would Allah have ordered Firishta to do so? I did not ask why you rely on hadith and to prove its authenticity, I asked why you think it is logical to go against the injunctions of the Quran. You are right, this has been debated endlessly yet it was brought up by you and others upon seeing this waaz. Moulana Taher TUS himself has addressed this in his past waaz.Ozdundee wrote:Secondly why is it so necessary to prostrate and confuse the faith. Leave somethings totally for Allah so their is no confusion no question. one does not get Sawab for prostrating and it is so close to shirk. Ask yourself how careful are you when choosing halal food, perfume with alcohol, water purity for wuzu, direction of kibla, timing for iftar, yet you ask me why I rely on hadith when giving the same level of concern for purity when worshiping my Creator. This has been debated endlessly.
The Dai is not here to win a popularity constant, he is here to do Dawat as per Haqq, as per Duat Salefeen have done so in the past. As Moulana TUS stated in the waaz, Ameerul Mumineen AS has stated that so what if I am one on Haqq, as long as I am on Haqq. Misaq and Ta'at are core tenets to Shia and Ismaili faith, which we are part of. Transparency is not conflated with these tenets, transparency can and does exist within faithful members of the community, along with utmost obedience to the Dai. Dawat-ul-Haq is not a democracy, the leader is not chosen by people but by Allah, that is a core part of our faith.Ozdundee wrote:The point I was making STF did not need the prostration to win hearts and minds. But by sticking to practises that provoke concerns amongst Muslims , reformists and people who have decent knowledge causes schism and rift and does not help his dawat or unity. I have not mentioned help from Allah that he seriously needs to progress his cause.
Things like sujuds, misaq, transparency are core and does not affect authority. Western democracies are as powerful with decentealised control, eg prime ministers and transparency. The fear of testing loyalty at every second is old school and for the insecure.
This leaves STF and his mission at cross roads is he here to return the community to the right path towards Islam or continue the drift that was started years ago that Bohras became so isolated from mainstream Islam and mixed things up big time. If this is a slight flavour to SMS , some of us will have to seek options as it is not good enough.
The way these Kothari families are at logger heads with each other, it does seem like a popularity contest. Respect to SKQ kothar as they are low profile, but that could be because of lack of numbers and resources. Playing underdog until they get powerful enough as SMS kothar.mustafazr wrote:The Dai is not here to win a popularity constant, he is here to do Dawat as per Haqq, as per Duat Salefeen have done so in the past. As Moulana TUS stated in the waaz, Ameerul Mumineen AS has stated that so what if I am one on Haqq, as long as I am on Haqq. Misaq and Ta'at are core tenets to Shia and Ismaili faith, which we are part of. Transparency is not conflated with these tenets, transparency can and does exist within faithful members of the community, along with utmost obedience to the Dai. Dawat-ul-Haq is not a democracy, the leader is not chosen by people but by Allah, that is a core part of our faith.
When has Syedna Qutbuddin's RA (and now Syedna Fakhruddin's TUS) dawat asked you for a single penny in the last 2.5 years? Zakat is mandatory like Salaat is mandatory - out of volition.humanbeing wrote:When it comes to collecting cash on various accounts, these guys will go all ballistic to mix faith tenets and wordly accounts, but when the tables are turned to show accountability again they dodge stating utmost obedience, trust, faith bullshit. Accountable only to faithful members = thieves like them, who will laugh it off.
Salaam bhai mustafazrthe leader is not chosen by people but by Allah
Brokimanumanu wrote:Bro humanbeing, there comes a time you have to accept that bygones are bygones and start to move on. The way you keep criticizing ex-Mazoon is clear that there is no convincing you otherwise. But he is now gone, as have both Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA and Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin RA. What we are left now are two contenders - SMS and STF and really a clear choice between those two. The SMS folks are a bit like you in that they still cannot let go of their baggage with ex-Mazoon. Time to move on and chart a new course whether it's with SMS or STF.
I've always said that. Proggies are closet Wahabis.qjbj wrote:I appreciate the struggles the reformists have gone through but its getting frustrating to read your gripes. I agree with your concerns for financial accountability. But from the waaz yesterday it was clear STF is a business minded person and accountability and transparency will not be an issue. Now you guys are complaining abut sajdas. Who cares....its not a compulsion if you don't want to do it don't. No one is forcing you. You are now sounding like the Wahaabis.
Brother Mustafazr, is this just emotional speech from your end? or does it really have some substance and reality associated with it?the leader is not chosen by people but by Allah
Khandani hey. Blood is same .maxthemature wrote:Haha taher fakhruddin the bigggest rascal and fraud on the face of this planet earth..we were done with those ideots in 90s itself! Prooven time and again wat they are! Like his father he will perish too and all his money along with it..wait and see!
can you please enlist what frauds Taher Fakhruddin has done so far? so we all can do "haha" as well.maxthemature wrote:Haha taher fakhruddin the bigggest rascal and fraud on the face of this planet earth..we were done with those ideots in 90s itself! Prooven time and again wat they are! Like his father he will perish too and all his money along with it..wait and see!
I couldn't have said it better myself. Innumerable wrongs by the Muslim community do not make a right, when the Quran has particularly stated examples of Allah commanding to do sajda to Waliullah. What matter is what is stated in the Quran and the seerat of our Awliyullah, starting from Rasulullah himself, followed by Panjetan, Aimmat and Duat. If those examples, again I want to stress the Quran and Rasulullah himself, don't hold weight for you, I'm not sure what will.Ateka wrote:Innumerable wrongs do not make a right, particularly when it's clearly dictated in the Quran.