Do you know what a metaphor is? Maybe the prophet was using a metaphor to explain his point. Maybe Allah does have a leg. How do you know? Have you seen him?
Even Margaret Thatcher uses "We" when referring to herself. Doesn't mean that Allah is one but she is more than one now does it? Most people from hyderabad refer to themselves as "Hum". Doesn't mean they are out of their minds does it?
Shias have objections if Allah has legs or mouth or ear or eyes or buttocks to sit on a throne. What do the shias think Allah is? A blob?
Bukhari shud be burnt
-
sixfeetunder
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:48 am
Re: Bukhari shud be burnt
Maybe. Maybe. Maybe - That is all you have. Probably, when you 'see' him on the Day of Judgement, you can ask him about his leg. I promise you, that won't be the lord of the worlds, that'll be your idol - your 'god' (with a leg).anajmi wrote:Do you know what a metaphor is? Maybe the prophet was using a metaphor to explain his point. Maybe Allah does have a leg. How do you know? Have you seen him?
Even Margaret Thatcher uses "We" when referring to herself. Doesn't mean that Allah is one but she is more than one now does it? Most people from hyderabad refer to themselves as "Hum". Doesn't mean they are out of their minds does it?
Shias have objections if Allah has legs or mouth or ear or eyes or buttocks to sit on a throne. What do the shias think Allah is? A blob?
It is easier to wake up a person if he is asleep. However, if he is pretending to be asleep, no matter how much you try to wake him up, he'll pretend not having heard you. Your case is like the latter one.
Why is it so difficult for you to accept that this is a fabricated rubbish hadith? You don't mind thinking that The Prophet (saw) would have explained such rubbish but you have a problem in accepting that Bukhari could have taken a fabricated hadith in his collection. Just goes to show what you think the Prophet (s.a.w) to be.
I repeat my previous words:
<<<<However, Sunnis tend to defend the most absurd ones, simply because they show the hadith collector or their sect in poor light. Is Imam Bukhari bigger than Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w)? Why is Bukhari defended even at the cost of showing Muhammad (s.a.w) in poor light? This is the sad state of Muslim affairs.>>>>
Re: Bukhari shud be burnt
That would be idiotic. Hadith can't be dismissed just because of your personal preferences. I am trying to figure out why I should dismiss a hadith. Was the prophet talking metaphorically or was he being literal? Can you answer that? Does Bukhari specify that the prophet was been literal? Can you say for certain say that Allah does not have a leg because you have seen him or because his anatomy has been described in a shia hadith and a leg is not part of that anatomy? Maybe Allah is a blob and he can grow a leg whenever he wants? After all, everything is possible for Allah right?Why is it so difficult for you to accept that this is a fabricated rubbish hadith?
-
Muslim First
- Posts: 6893
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 4:01 am
Re: Bukhari shud be burnt
Posted by Br. GM elsewhereDumb ass are those who follows this comic book called sahee bukhaarii...aisha and her father abu bakar shud have been ashamed of uttering too much filth about prophet (saw).shame on so called sunni muslims to praise these retards.
Is there any thing to learn from this br asif786 or incredible Idiot?One day Hazrat Abu Bakr (r.a.), during his period of Khilafat, smiled when he saw Ali (a.s.) come into Masjid-e-Nabavi. So Ali (a.s.) enquired for the reason. Hazrat Abu Bakr replied :
"I had heard the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) say : 'No one shall cross "Pul Sarat" i.e. the bridge to heaven across Hell without the permission of Ali' ".
At this remark Ali (a.s.) smiled. So Hazrat Abu Bakr (r.a.) asked out of curiosity for the cause. Ali (a.s.) replied :
"I shall not permit any one to cross Pul Sarat who does not love and respect you, O Abu Bakr".
This is in the knowledge of Shias is confirmed by the Shia Scholar Allama Jaurullah Zamakhshari in his research "Al - Mawafekatoe-Baina Ahlal-Bait was Sahaba".
Re: Bukhari shud be burnt
Br MFMuslim First wrote:Posted by Br. GM elsewhereDumb ass are those who follows this comic book called sahee bukhaarii...aisha and her father abu bakar shud have been ashamed of uttering too much filth about prophet (saw).shame on so called sunni muslims to praise these retards.
Is there any thing to learn from this br asif786 or incredible Idiot?One day Hazrat Abu Bakr (r.a.), during his period of Khilafat, smiled when he saw Ali (a.s.) come into Masjid-e-Nabavi. So Ali (a.s.) enquired for the reason. Hazrat Abu Bakr replied :
"I had heard the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.) say : 'No one shall cross "Pul Sarat" i.e. the bridge to heaven across Hell without the permission of Ali' ".
At this remark Ali (a.s.) smiled. So Hazrat Abu Bakr (r.a.) asked out of curiosity for the cause. Ali (a.s.) replied :
"I shall not permit any one to cross Pul Sarat who does not love and respect you, O Abu Bakr".
This is in the knowledge of Shias is confirmed by the Shia Scholar Allama Jaurullah Zamakhshari in his research "Al - Mawafekatoe-Baina Ahlal-Bait was Sahaba".
Sorry, but this hadith is a fabricated according to the shias , You can believe it but not us because i am sure the the narrators will be very weak and maybe manufactured by Bani Ummaya
Re: Bukhari shud be burnt
Anajmianajmi wrote:That would be idiotic. Hadith can't be dismissed just because of your personal preferences. I am trying to figure out why I should dismiss a hadith. Was the prophet talking metaphorically or was he being literal? Can you answer that? Does Bukhari specify that the prophet was been literal? Can you say for certain say that Allah does not have a leg because you have seen him or because his anatomy has been described in a shia hadith and a leg is not part of that anatomy? Maybe Allah is a blob and he can grow a leg whenever he wants? After all, everything is possible for Allah right?Why is it so difficult for you to accept that this is a fabricated rubbish hadith?
You have enjoyed calling shias idol worshippers now defend your god who sits on throne and is like khalli 7 or 8 feet with human like features ( Nauzobillah) . You are like hindu who have idol in front of them and you idol in your mind and heart
Re: Bukhari shud be burnt
lol why are 6ftunder and asif so worked up abt Allah's legs. it could have been metaphorical. get over it.
Though I do agree with the idea of destroying the hadith books of Prophet pbuh and Ali a.s, simply because the narrators are flawed and both were compiled hundreds of years after their deaths, citing a chain of narrators which is imposible to prove. What the prophet pbuh said is perfect, but not what was passed down mouth to mouth for centuries then compiled by bukhari.
u must ackhnowledge atleast that there must be mistakes in it as bukhari was not perfect nor was the century-long chain of riwayat? right?
Though I do agree with the idea of destroying the hadith books of Prophet pbuh and Ali a.s, simply because the narrators are flawed and both were compiled hundreds of years after their deaths, citing a chain of narrators which is imposible to prove. What the prophet pbuh said is perfect, but not what was passed down mouth to mouth for centuries then compiled by bukhari.
u must ackhnowledge atleast that there must be mistakes in it as bukhari was not perfect nor was the century-long chain of riwayat? right?