#56
Unread post
by Al Zulfiqar » Wed Feb 23, 2011 2:33 pm
if the syedna had made a deal with narendra modi to really save his followers' lives and businesses and properties, it would be pardonable. no, its patently obvious its his properties, his wealth and his income generating mazaars and masjids/markaz's that he wants to protect.
when a leader like him foolishly uttered laanats on loudspeakers and riots broke out, did he stop to consider the consequences for his community and their well-being? NO. he never expressed an iota of an apology to his dead, injured and looted abdes, whereas he had to swallow humble pie and issue a public apology on tv to the other muslims at hurting their feelings.
appeasing a monster is one thing. going overboard in felicitating him, garlanding him, putting shawls on him, giving his party crores in donations (bribes) and praising him effusively, inviting him for all sorts of frivolous events etc, proves only one thing. that the syedna hunts with the wolves and sleeps with the lambs. that he has so successfully got away with it so far without wide scale protests from the sunni and other muslims is a measure of how many prominent sunni leaders he has bribed and kept happy. its also a telling factor of the weakness, disunity and corruption prevailing among the majority muslim communities.
our saifee mahal mafia is adept at playing every machiavellian card in their bag of tricks. with modi they play up the common gujrati angle, "apne banne waaniya", "aavo bhai harkha, apne bewe sarkha" crap. with the sunni/shia factions they play the devout muslim and protectors of islam bakwas when bohras are the biggest human worshipping kafirs.
with a leader like syedna, who hides the murky past concerning his own mother, murders animals for sport and allows sajda to himself, refuses to give accounts and claims false miracles, can one expect any altruistic motives from his getting into bed with modi?