Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

The one and only free public forum for Bohras. The focus of this forum is the reform movement, the Dawoodi Bohra faith and, of course, the corrupt priesthood. But the discussion is in no way restricted to the Bohras alone.
SBM
Posts: 6508
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 4:01 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#31

Unread post by SBM » Sun Mar 20, 2011 5:23 pm

Stranger
We went through the same justification by members of other side justifying the felicitation of Modi, The only reason I brought this because you asked me whether I would curse Yazid and Shimr, well in my books there is no difference between Yazid-Shimr or Narendra Modi and Bal Thackrey and I can not justify honoring anyone of them regardless of the outcome.
YOU HAVE TO FIGHT FOR YOUR HONOR AND FOR HAQ OF WHICH KOTHAR BEATS THE DRUM ALL THE TIME

Muslim First
Posts: 6893
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2001 4:01 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#32

Unread post by Muslim First » Sun Mar 20, 2011 8:45 pm

Let me tell you something...During the Gujarat Riots there was pressure on Gujarat Govn to spare the life, property, business and prayer place of Bohra's
( I know, Its hard for you to digest this but its true.) and it did work also but unfortunately, not entirely.
As a Muslim I am sick to my stomach to read this admission. Among Muslim ummah we have group of people who would even think of using bribery to assuage devil. Those who shake hands of this Shaitan are shaitan themselves.

I hope a day will never dawn in India when Muslims of India will say kill Borha first when they see serpent and Bohra obstructing their way

My sincere apology to my brothers for these harsh words.

stranger
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:27 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#33

Unread post by stranger » Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:38 am

omabharti wrote:Stranger
We went through the same justification by members of other side justifying the felicitation of Modi, The only reason I brought this because you asked me whether I would curse Yazid and Shimr, well in my books there is no difference between Yazid-Shimr or Narendra Modi and Bal Thackrey and I can not justify honoring anyone of them regardless of the outcome.
YOU HAVE TO FIGHT FOR YOUR HONOR AND FOR HAQ OF WHICH KOTHAR BEATS THE DRUM ALL THE TIME
Oma,
I suppose, have already explained what u had asked and said what was required..However Its upto you finaly, how u take it.

stranger
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:27 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#34

Unread post by stranger » Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:01 am

Muslim First wrote: As a Muslim I am sick to my stomach to read this admission. Among Muslim ummah we have group of people who would even think of using bribery to assuage devil. Those who shake hands of this Shaitan are shaitan themselves.

I hope a day will never dawn in India when Muslims of India will say kill Borha first when they see serpent and Bohra obstructing their way .

My sincere apology to my brothers for these harsh words.
Muslim First,
I can very well reply to your post which will be enough to make you whole sick and too harsh, too true for you to face..Alright.
brother, i dont want to mix communal colors in it..nor wanna blame or critise entire community ( as you do), Just because you have derived conclusion on your limited understanding and narrow interpretations..And yeah, apology accepted :)

Wassalam.

Al Zulfiqar
Posts: 4618
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:01 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#35

Unread post by Al Zulfiqar » Wed Mar 23, 2011 9:08 pm

stranger,

why the bashfulnes now? afraid to get all the abde backsides kicked and burnt just as the infallible mutlaq ilah ul ardh, haqiqi kaaba, natiqe quran and haq nasaheb syedna did last time when he foolishly uttered public laanats on the first 3 khalifas, got his abdes killed, looted and their businesses destroyed and then had to apologise like a sorry recalcitrant kid on nationwide TV??

what is there to hide?? c'mon blurt out what you say behind the closed doors of the bohra markaz/masjids. that all the rest of the muslims are idiots and kafirs, only bohra abdes are chosen for jannat, courtesy a ruku chitthi from their morela. be a man and say it upfront. dont hide like a coward behind ' i cud say so and so, but wont' crap.

if you have the guts, proclaim loudly your beliefs here since you are followers of haq nasaheb. somehow the image of shrinking violets and untouched coy virgins doesnt suit abdes, as they pretend to be tigers in their markaz's.

stranger
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:27 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#36

Unread post by stranger » Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:38 am

Al Zulfiqar wrote:stranger,

why the bashfulnes now? afraid to get all the abde backsides kicked and burnt just as the infallible mutlaq ilah ul ardh, haqiqi kaaba, natiqe quran and haq nasaheb syedna did last time when he foolishly uttered public laanats on the first 3 khalifas, got his abdes killed, looted and their businesses destroyed and then had to apologise like a sorry recalcitrant kid on nationwide TV??

what is there to hide?? c'mon blurt out what you say behind the closed doors of the bohra markaz/masjids. that all the rest of the muslims are idiots and kafirs, only bohra abdes are chosen for jannat, courtesy a ruku chitthi from their morela. be a man and say it upfront. dont hide like a coward behind ' i cud say so and so, but wont' crap.

if you have the guts, proclaim loudly your beliefs here since you are followers of haq nasaheb. somehow the image of shrinking violets and untouched coy virgins doesnt suit abdes, as they pretend to be tigers in their markaz's.
Achchaa....
Poor abdes, So sad :( ... but then you must be having enough guts & courage to proclaim ur reformist belief..
Can you just please let us know your full Name and Address ? Then i will see, if u can speak with equal bravery with your real face as well, or its just limited to shouting and dancing on this forums :mrgreen:

Doctor
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:16 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#37

Unread post by Doctor » Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:05 am

Doctor wrote:
murtaza2152 wrote:@Doctor,
Can you present a Single proof that Muqaddas Syedna Taher Saifuddin RA Spoke lie in Court??


You have also not presented proof of Saiyadi Sadiq Ali Sahebs Nasihat, ie Matlaa of Nasihat and last 5 Stanzas of it...
You have just copy pasted from Insafs Post..!!
Why no response on point of Burhanuddin sahab uttering 'gaali' - which was your limelight point?

If I present proof right now that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies then what will you do next? Will u follow the suit of Quran in sending laanat on Taher Saifuddin sahab?
If you wish to learn more from Sadik Ali sahab nasihat then please contact Janab Saifuddin Insaf on this forum or Prof. Mulla Mehdi Hasan in Malegaon or Bhai Aaqib Palana Wala in Mumbai or Mulla Peer Ali / Janab Abid Adeeb in Udaipur.

Even an 'adna mumin' should not utter 'gaali', it is bad than worst if claimant of position of 'Dai': Burhanuddin sahab gives 'gaali' ("MANAHIS") to Sheikh Ahmed Ali Raj! It infers, Burhanuddin sahab do not even qualify to be called (basic) 'mumin' .

Murtaza2152, as a abde Burhan you must write 'arzi' to Burhanuddin sahab and make him realize that by uttering 'gaali' he is bringing shame and dishonor to the seat of Dai (which he claims to occupy).

Also please let us all know: If I present proof that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies then what will you do next? Will u follow the suit of Quran in sending laanat on liers = Taher Saifuddin sahab?

progpigs
Posts: 99
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:55 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#38

Unread post by progpigs » Fri Mar 25, 2011 8:29 am

stranger wrote:Can you just please let us know your full Name and Address ? Then i will see, if u can speak with equal bravery with your real face as well, or its just limited to shouting and dancing on this forums :mrgreen:
Hey even i m joining you "Stranger" for this sawab :D :wink:

stranger
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:27 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#39

Unread post by stranger » Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:16 pm

progpigs wrote: Hey even i m joining you "Stranger" for this sawab :D :wink:
Most welcome bother....But it seems, ye invitation sunte hi, paint gili ho gayi saaheb ki :mrgreen:

profastian
Posts: 1314
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:00 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#40

Unread post by profastian » Fri Mar 25, 2011 3:40 pm

stranger wrote:
Most welcome bother....But it seems, ye invitation sunte hi, paint gili ho gayi saaheb ki
pant or skirt :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

stranger
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:27 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#41

Unread post by stranger » Sat Mar 26, 2011 2:34 pm

profastian wrote: pant or skirt :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
I guess both :roll: , depends on 'Occassion'. :mrgreen:

murtaza2152
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#42

Unread post by murtaza2152 » Sun Mar 27, 2011 2:08 am

Doctor wrote:
Doctor wrote: Why no response on point of Burhanuddin sahab uttering 'gaali' - which was your limelight point?

If I present proof right now that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies then what will you do next? Will u follow the suit of Quran in sending laanat on Taher Saifuddin sahab?
If you wish to learn more from Sadik Ali sahab nasihat then please contact Janab Saifuddin Insaf on this forum or Prof. Mulla Mehdi Hasan in Malegaon or Bhai Aaqib Palana Wala in Mumbai or Mulla Peer Ali / Janab Abid Adeeb in Udaipur.
You quoted the proof so you should present it,,and why should i ask those Munafiqs ,,,,If you have present them....
Even an 'adna mumin' should not utter 'gaali', it is bad than worst if claimant of position of 'Dai': Burhanuddin sahab gives 'gaali' ("MANAHIS") to Sheikh Ahmed Ali Raj! It infers, Burhanuddin sahab do not even qualify to be called (basic) 'mumin' .
He was a Manahis so we called him Manahis...Simple :mrgreen: Like a Donkey is called Donkey :lol:

Murtaza2152, as a abde Burhan you must write 'arzi' to Burhanuddin sahab and make him realize that by uttering 'gaali' he is bringing shame and dishonor to the seat of Dai (which he claims to occupy).

Also please let us all know: If I present proof that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies then what will you do next? Will u follow the suit of Quran in sending laanat on liers = Taher Saifuddin sahab?
Give your proof i will act according to quraan....

Doctor
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:16 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#43

Unread post by Doctor » Sun Apr 03, 2011 6:00 am

murtaza2152 wrote:
Doctor wrote: Also please let us all know: If I present proof that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies then what will you do next? Will u follow the suit of Quran in sending laanat on liers = Taher Saifuddin sahab?
Give your proof i will act according to quraan....
Proof: http://bombayhighcourt.nic.in/libweb/hi ... _CASE.html

From the above proof it is proved either Taher Saifuddin sahab has spoken lie in the first place when he claimed he is God or he spoke lie when he took back his original claim with new stand that he is not God. In either case he spoke lie.

Murtaza bhai, you have committed to follow the Quran so, now act.

murtaza2152
Posts: 253
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#44

Unread post by murtaza2152 » Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:00 am

Oh Mubarak ,,i very well knew u will give me this link,,,,
At least read the article before u post,,,,, This been already discussed many times on this forum Refer to http://dawoodi-bohras.com/forum/viewtop ... b&start=30......

Refer to 2nd para,,
second para, first line itself says this,
As Sir Thomas Strangman, the Advocate-General, who filed the suit and appeared for the plaintiff throughout the trial, observes in his book

now do you want to debate on a article written by a advocate general who him self is the plaintiff in this case......

Doctor
Posts: 235
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:16 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#45

Unread post by Doctor » Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:22 am

Porus bhai has rightly said about you: you are intellectually dishonest.

The point we are discussing is if Taher Saifuddin sahab spoke lies or not.

Bombay High Court is a Government body, its case records are authentic. Per Bombay High court records, published on their website: Taher Saifuddin sahab has spoken lies.

It is not Advocate General/Plaintiff but Taher Saifuddin sahab who claimed that he is God and later took back claim that he is not God.In either of statement it is self proving that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies.

candela
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:01 am

Re: Progressive Bohras and Ahmed Ali Raj

#46

Unread post by candela » Sun Apr 10, 2011 1:33 pm

Doctor wrote:It is not Advocate General/Plaintiff but Taher Saifuddin sahab who claimed that he is God and later took back claim that he is not God.In either of statement it is self proving that Taher Saifuddin spoke lies.
Assalaamu alaikum,

Wasn't something to this effect also admitted in "Mullahs on the Mainframe" by Jonah Blank, which was not endorsed by the syedna per se but was nonetheless written with his permission?

Even if, at best, it was not Taher Saifuddin himself but someone else with him who put forward the claim that Taher was "*$d @n @#$%h" (I'm at the moment too disgusted to type it all out, note the last letter of each word), it still reflects badly enough on the "immaculate" Taher that he could not be the representative of God in any divine way.