Dawoodi Bohra Forum

Universaldad wrote:Mumineen have chosen their Dai in their hearts for life. Some unfortunate people who have a doubt to this; waver and fall to the side and/or take to another calling. This is their choice.

Those (un)fortunate people have also chosen a Dai - albeit a different one.

I don't think you Reformist have any common agenda , neither you have common path , nor common views ... You curse the the voluntary contribution being made by the followers of SMS as tax .... but you are also collecting money in the name of DONATION ... You have only created this forum to satisfy ...

The Fatemi Dawat website has been planned in advance. It is not possible to put something like this together overnight. This website was registered in November 2013, the whole setup seems of USA. The registrant address is from the USA because the domain registrant name has been kept "Private&q...

For the first time in my lifetime - I am feeling ashamed of my community :(. community is as it was, it is more problem with the leadership. bohras gave their entire life in such hands who were not capable of taking any solid decisions or making his own family free from corruption, and now what we ...

For the first time in my lifetime - I am feeling ashamed of my community .

NOW HE JUST TRYING HARD TO TAKE OVER THE TITLE " DAI", EVEN HE IS NOT DESERVE TO BE A MUSLIM - DAWOODI BOHRA. SHAME ON HIM , HE DID NOT ATTEND MOLA'S LAST DAYS ! WHAT HE WILL GUIDE US AS HE IS NOT TRUE FOLLOWERS IN ISLAM ! Its unfortunate that the 52nd Dai didn't realize this and stripped...

These Zaadas could not even wait for Tijja of their brother's death (Hatim BS Hamiduddin) before starting the Ziyafaat rounds what a shame http://www.zeninfosys.net/zi6/akhbar/saadatkiraam/karachi/16340 Shz Qasim Bhai Saheb Hakimuddin Saheb (DM) Gives Ziyafat Sharaf to Late Shk.Zakiuddin Eranpur Wa...

From what I heard he was the brother of the Dai TUS.

sorry sir but in many cities of india if you refuse to take thali then janab not give raza ,its compulsory for mumin,this is for your kind information In our city, Amil sahab announced that if the green safai chitti holders do not subscribe to the scheme they will be demoted to a yellow safai chitt...

mustafanalwalla wrote: So i guess its extremely subjective.

Agreed.

mustafanalwalla wrote: So, lets move on. Ok?

And agreed.

also ,if given openly ,one cannot say this is from moula. Many a times mumineen on a personal basis foot the expenses of feeding mumineen on many religious occasions, but announcement is made that this jaman is from moula and this is simply not true. Nope. What you say is simply not true. Every yea...

I'm sorry but a "genuine question" like this deserves to be ridiculed. Please don't turn this into abde vs. reformists issue. Questions like these reveal how Bohras have become obsessed with ritualistic trivialities and are missing the big picture. And all this obsession is encouraged by ...

AgnosticTheist, Let me ask you a genuine question - Would you be ok with taking a bath in your own sweat? I would like to give the benefit of doubt to murtaza2152 because of this statement. Its a strange question but nothing is strange in Fiqh. I personally am not interested in knowing the answer.

abde53 wrote:AG bhai
i do not know if you are progressive opposition or a true mumin

I am Dawoodi Bohra!

A genuine question like this does not deserve the replies you guys are giving. If you do not wish to answer then a simple "take this with your Amil" reply would be more than sufficient. How will Abdes connect with you and listen to you (and your agenda) with open minds if they are turned a...

@Progticide, good answer indeed!. Thank you.

Every enemy of the Dai-e-Mutlaq is Shaitaan. Whoever wishes ill for the Dai-e-Mutlaq is Shaitaan. Whoever nurtures hatred or promotes hatred for the Dai-e-Mutlaq is Shaitaan. Whoever belittles the authority of Dai-e-Mutlaq is Shaitaan. Whoever, allies with/supports/encourages/endorses any of the ab...

I like to stick to the topic as much as possible. So brother progticide, do you have any reply to the questions I raised regarding the creation and the creator? It is perfectly fine if you don't have any reply/answer. Neither do I have nor most of the people in this world. Please try to give an on-t...

This forum is for people who have already accepted the Oneness of Allah, almighty and merciful, who neither begets nor is begotten. Since you have not yet accepted this, I suggest you complete your research first and revisit when you are done. In case your research does not yield results matching o...

profastian wrote:Isn't that obvious. The proof is the creation

In which case please refer my earlier post. If creation is the proof, then God himself is a creation needing a creator. Isn't it? So there must be a bigger God? and for creating that bigger God there must be even a bigger God and so on...

Just because science has not explained a few mysteries, it does not mean we should believe in existence of a creator. I do not know of anyone who believes in a creator because science wasn't able to explain a few mysteries. Do you? Belief in a creator comes naturally to a human. Some see science cr...

Would anyone be kind enough to bring the thread back to its original topic.

Anyone want to comment on what I said in my earlier posts?

I don't think what you are saying is feasible for the following reasons: Too many posts to review every day. Laborious task for a single person i.e. Admin (unless there is a group of other members in the Admin group) Very difficult to categorize the content as described by you. There is a very thin ...

admin; assuming there are about a million bohris in the world to day; then do your figures reflect that about 10% of them visit this site? Not really. We need to focus on the "Unique Visitors" (49K) and not the "Visits". Also the stats does not confirm that only Dawoodi Bohras v...

I still do not discount the existence of a creator until science proves all the unexplained mysteries that are out there Just because science has not explained a few mysteries, it does not mean we should believe in existence of a creator. Remember, a few decades/centuries ago there were lots and lo...

AliRehbar wrote:what is the point to copy paste here, where hardly 10 posters posts.....

Don't go by the number of posters my friend. You have no idea about the readership!!

profastian wrote:Isn't the argument that "because there is creation, the creator must be present", too shallow?

It indeed is. If a creation needs a creator then isn't God himself a creation needing a creator? Or did he appear magically just like that?